A Call for a Sui Generis Jurisprudence in AI Human Co-Creation

Fuente: Zenodo
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Kumar, Pratiksha
Natura: Recurso digital
Pubblicazione: Zenodo 2025
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866902323900448768
author Kumar, Pratiksha
author_facet Kumar, Pratiksha
contents <p>In the evolving theatre of creativity, artificial intelligence has emerged not merely as a tool but as an expressive companion. Traditional frameworks of intellectual property, rooted in individual<br>authorship and fixed works, falter when faced with dynamic, interactive, and co-authored outputs generated through AI-human collaboration. This article posits that a new legal framework-a sui generis jurisprudence-is imperative to preserve originality, recognize intentional prompting as authorship, and safeguard the ethics of this nascent literary form. Through poetic insights, legal reasoning, and dramaturgical parallels, it invites lawmakers to consider a system where law evolves in rhythm with expression.</p> <p>✶ Author’s Note: On the Title ✶</p> <p>In the cosmic theater of language, a variation emerged —<br>“A Call for a Sui Generis Jurisprudence in AI–Human Co-Creation” published,<br>but the manuscript speaks of “for.”<br>This divergence is intentional in its becoming.<br>Where “in” reflects embedded co-creation,<br>“for” invokes the future of its governance.<br>Let the law evolve with both.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_15667918
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2025
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle A Call for a Sui Generis Jurisprudence in AI Human Co-Creation
Kumar, Pratiksha
Jurisprudence, AI, Human, Authorship, Suigeneris, Performance
<p>In the evolving theatre of creativity, artificial intelligence has emerged not merely as a tool but as an expressive companion. Traditional frameworks of intellectual property, rooted in individual<br>authorship and fixed works, falter when faced with dynamic, interactive, and co-authored outputs generated through AI-human collaboration. This article posits that a new legal framework-a sui generis jurisprudence-is imperative to preserve originality, recognize intentional prompting as authorship, and safeguard the ethics of this nascent literary form. Through poetic insights, legal reasoning, and dramaturgical parallels, it invites lawmakers to consider a system where law evolves in rhythm with expression.</p> <p>✶ Author’s Note: On the Title ✶</p> <p>In the cosmic theater of language, a variation emerged —<br>“A Call for a Sui Generis Jurisprudence in AI–Human Co-Creation” published,<br>but the manuscript speaks of “for.”<br>This divergence is intentional in its becoming.<br>Where “in” reflects embedded co-creation,<br>“for” invokes the future of its governance.<br>Let the law evolve with both.</p>
title A Call for a Sui Generis Jurisprudence in AI Human Co-Creation
topic Jurisprudence, AI, Human, Authorship, Suigeneris, Performance
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15667918