Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aumer, Wolfgang, Möller, Morten, Eckhardt, Christian
Format: Recurso digital
Language:English
Published: Zenodo 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15674498
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866901516475957248
author Aumer, Wolfgang
Möller, Morten
Eckhardt, Christian
author_facet Aumer, Wolfgang
Möller, Morten
Eckhardt, Christian
contents <p>For the study of soil-atmosphere exchange of greenhouse gases, a commonly adopted method is to monitor the change of gas concentrations in closed chambers. The datasets presented here are raw data and subsequent flux calculation results from a study comparing two techniques to determine gas concentrations in air: Gas Chromatography (GC) and mid-infrared laser absorption spectroscopy (LAS). Both techniques were compared by carrying out simultaneous chamber measurements under field conditions on two separate days covering a range of CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes. The GC method involved syringe sampling into gas-tight vials and subsequent laboratory analysis. In contrast to that, a LAS analyzer was directly connected to the chambers (tubing system) and thus enabled real-time, high-temporal resolution data.</p> <p>A detailed description of the experimental setup and the data analysis is available in Aumer & Möller et al. (2025): Technical note: Gas chromatography vs. mid-infrared laser absorption spectroscopy: A comparison of methods for measuring greenhouse gas fluxes from arable soils. EGUsphere preprint. DOI: 10.5194/egusphere-2025-2862.</p> <p>The long-term experiment (AKHWA project, URL: www.akhwa.de), where the experiment took place, and the laser gas analyzers were funded by the Hessian Ministry for Agriculture, Environment, Viticulture, Forestry, Hunting and Homeland Affairs (Germany).</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_15674498
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2025
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Closed chamber flux dataset comparing gas chromatography and mid-infrared laser absorption spectroscopy for greenhouse gas measurements
Aumer, Wolfgang
Möller, Morten
Eckhardt, Christian
gas chromatography
greenhouse gases
laser absorption spectroscopy
chamber flux calculation
<p>For the study of soil-atmosphere exchange of greenhouse gases, a commonly adopted method is to monitor the change of gas concentrations in closed chambers. The datasets presented here are raw data and subsequent flux calculation results from a study comparing two techniques to determine gas concentrations in air: Gas Chromatography (GC) and mid-infrared laser absorption spectroscopy (LAS). Both techniques were compared by carrying out simultaneous chamber measurements under field conditions on two separate days covering a range of CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes. The GC method involved syringe sampling into gas-tight vials and subsequent laboratory analysis. In contrast to that, a LAS analyzer was directly connected to the chambers (tubing system) and thus enabled real-time, high-temporal resolution data.</p> <p>A detailed description of the experimental setup and the data analysis is available in Aumer & Möller et al. (2025): Technical note: Gas chromatography vs. mid-infrared laser absorption spectroscopy: A comparison of methods for measuring greenhouse gas fluxes from arable soils. EGUsphere preprint. DOI: 10.5194/egusphere-2025-2862.</p> <p>The long-term experiment (AKHWA project, URL: www.akhwa.de), where the experiment took place, and the laser gas analyzers were funded by the Hessian Ministry for Agriculture, Environment, Viticulture, Forestry, Hunting and Homeland Affairs (Germany).</p>
title Closed chamber flux dataset comparing gas chromatography and mid-infrared laser absorption spectroscopy for greenhouse gas measurements
topic gas chromatography
greenhouse gases
laser absorption spectroscopy
chamber flux calculation
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15674498