Holopyga wagneriella du Buysson 1904

Fuente: Zenodo
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosa, Paolo, Brothers, Denis J.
Formato: Recurso digital
Publicado: Zenodo 2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866902131986923520
author Rosa, Paolo
Brothers, Denis J.
author_facet Rosa, Paolo
Brothers, Denis J.
contents <p><b><i>Holopyga wagneriella</i> du Buysson, 1904</b></p><p><i>Holopyga wagneriella</i> du Buysson, 1904: 255. Syntypes ♂ and ♀; Argentina: Santiago del Estero, La Palisa 5 km N Brucho, 1903, E.R. Wagner (type depository unknown). Brèthes (1909); Bischoff (1913); Kimsey & Bohart (1991).</p><p><i>Holopyga wagnerella</i>: incorrect subsequent spelling by du Buysson (1906, 1909, 1910); Ducke (1914), Rocha-Filho <i>et al</i>. (2019); Lucena & Almeida (2022); Lucena <i>et al</i>. (2022, 2024: 52).</p><p>Lucena <i>et al</i>. (2024) considered the incorrect subsequent spelling <i>wagnerella</i> as a justified emendation and the original spelling <i>wagneriella</i> as an “incorrect subsequent spelling” [sic!]. Their justification states: “The name “ <i>Holopyga Wagneriella</i> ” appears just once on the heading of the species description. No other mention to this name is presented in the original work. Thereafter, the name “ <i>Holopyga Wagnerella</i> ” was recurrently cited by du Buysson (1906, 1909, 1910), clearly indicating an emendation to original intended name”. This interpretation is incorrect, as it only reflects the repetition of an incorrect subsequent spelling by du Buysson and does not constitute a valid emendation. For an emendation to be valid, it must be demonstrably intentional, and this can occur when there is an explicit statement of intent in the work itself or in an author’s (or publisher’s) corrigenda, or when both the original and the changed spelling are cited and the latter is adopted in place of the former, or when two or more names in the same work are treated in a similar way (Code Art. 33.2.1). None of these conditions apply here. Furthermore, the name <i>wagnerella</i> cannot be considered to be in prevailing use, and other citations of <i>wagneriella</i> exist in the literature (e.g. Brèthes 1909). The spelling <i>wagneriella</i> must thus be considered to be the correct original spelling.</p><p>du Buysson (1904) described <i>Holopyga wagneriella</i> based on specimens of both sexes (lengths 3–5 mm) in MNHN, from Argentina, Santiago del Estero Province, La Palisa, 5 km north of Brucho (leg. Wagner, 1903). The specimen labelled as a type at MNHN was collected in Brazil, Minas Gerais, in 1903 and cannot be considered part of the type series, as noted by Lucena <i>et al</i>. (2024). A second specimen housed at MNHN was collected in Argentina in 1907 and is also not part of the type series. The location of the syntypes is currently unknown, but they are apparently lost or destroyed.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_15843635
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2025
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Holopyga wagneriella du Buysson 1904
Rosa, Paolo
Brothers, Denis J.
Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hymenoptera
Chrysididae
Holopyga
Holopyga wagneriella
<p><b><i>Holopyga wagneriella</i> du Buysson, 1904</b></p><p><i>Holopyga wagneriella</i> du Buysson, 1904: 255. Syntypes ♂ and ♀; Argentina: Santiago del Estero, La Palisa 5 km N Brucho, 1903, E.R. Wagner (type depository unknown). Brèthes (1909); Bischoff (1913); Kimsey & Bohart (1991).</p><p><i>Holopyga wagnerella</i>: incorrect subsequent spelling by du Buysson (1906, 1909, 1910); Ducke (1914), Rocha-Filho <i>et al</i>. (2019); Lucena & Almeida (2022); Lucena <i>et al</i>. (2022, 2024: 52).</p><p>Lucena <i>et al</i>. (2024) considered the incorrect subsequent spelling <i>wagnerella</i> as a justified emendation and the original spelling <i>wagneriella</i> as an “incorrect subsequent spelling” [sic!]. Their justification states: “The name “ <i>Holopyga Wagneriella</i> ” appears just once on the heading of the species description. No other mention to this name is presented in the original work. Thereafter, the name “ <i>Holopyga Wagnerella</i> ” was recurrently cited by du Buysson (1906, 1909, 1910), clearly indicating an emendation to original intended name”. This interpretation is incorrect, as it only reflects the repetition of an incorrect subsequent spelling by du Buysson and does not constitute a valid emendation. For an emendation to be valid, it must be demonstrably intentional, and this can occur when there is an explicit statement of intent in the work itself or in an author’s (or publisher’s) corrigenda, or when both the original and the changed spelling are cited and the latter is adopted in place of the former, or when two or more names in the same work are treated in a similar way (Code Art. 33.2.1). None of these conditions apply here. Furthermore, the name <i>wagnerella</i> cannot be considered to be in prevailing use, and other citations of <i>wagneriella</i> exist in the literature (e.g. Brèthes 1909). The spelling <i>wagneriella</i> must thus be considered to be the correct original spelling.</p><p>du Buysson (1904) described <i>Holopyga wagneriella</i> based on specimens of both sexes (lengths 3–5 mm) in MNHN, from Argentina, Santiago del Estero Province, La Palisa, 5 km north of Brucho (leg. Wagner, 1903). The specimen labelled as a type at MNHN was collected in Brazil, Minas Gerais, in 1903 and cannot be considered part of the type series, as noted by Lucena <i>et al</i>. (2024). A second specimen housed at MNHN was collected in Argentina in 1907 and is also not part of the type series. The location of the syntypes is currently unknown, but they are apparently lost or destroyed.</p>
title Holopyga wagneriella du Buysson 1904
topic Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hymenoptera
Chrysididae
Holopyga
Holopyga wagneriella
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15843635