Medical Ethics: Epikeia and Proportionality
Fuente:
Zenodo
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866902085646155776 |
|---|---|
| author | Franz, Staudt |
| author_facet | Franz, Staudt |
| contents | <p>The coronavirus crisis has brought special attention to medical ethics. Advances in medicine, which give rise to new ethical<br>dilemmas, also argue for a stronger emphasis on medical ethics. Examples include organ transplantation with the question, e.g.<br>of the criteria for death, euthanasia, preimplantation or prenatal diagnostics, human genetics and the discussion about the<br>“informed consensus”. Multi-disciplinary expertise (philosophy, research, clinical practice, legislation, politics, etc.) is essential<br>for an ethical consideration of these topics.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_15846232 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Medical Ethics: Epikeia and Proportionality Franz, Staudt <p>The coronavirus crisis has brought special attention to medical ethics. Advances in medicine, which give rise to new ethical<br>dilemmas, also argue for a stronger emphasis on medical ethics. Examples include organ transplantation with the question, e.g.<br>of the criteria for death, euthanasia, preimplantation or prenatal diagnostics, human genetics and the discussion about the<br>“informed consensus”. Multi-disciplinary expertise (philosophy, research, clinical practice, legislation, politics, etc.) is essential<br>for an ethical consideration of these topics.</p> |
| title | Medical Ethics: Epikeia and Proportionality |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15846232 |