Addressing and Reducing the Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP) Vs Ventilator Bundle in Intensive Care Units - An Review

Fuente: Zenodo
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paramasivam Asari Geetha, Dr. Mohan Rao, Dr. Subala
Formato: Recurso digital
Publicado: Zenodo 2025
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866901642774839296
author Paramasivam Asari Geetha
Dr. Mohan Rao
Dr. Subala
author_facet Paramasivam Asari Geetha
Dr. Mohan Rao
Dr. Subala
contents <p>Background: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common infection that can happen in hospitals, especially in intensive care units. Following proper guidelines to prevent VAP helps reduce infections and improves how patients recover.</p> <p>Aim: This study looked at how often VAP occurred, how well nurses followed the VAP care steps (called Ventilator bundle), and whether this affected patient outcomes.</p> <p> Study Design: This was a Quantitative study. It included ICU patients who were on ventilators for at least 48 hours..</p> <p>Results: Out of 100 patients, 22.3% developed VAP. The infection rate was 5.6 per 1,000 ventilator days. Nurses followed the VAP care bundle 69% of the time, but this decreased over the hospital stay. Higher nurse compliance was linked to:  Shorter hospital stays  Fewer days on a ventilator  Lower hospital costs Patients  who did not get VAP had better nurse compliance (average 72.9%) than those who did get VAP (average 56.6%).</p> <p>Conclusions: Better nurse compliance with VAP guidelines leads to improved patient outcomes. Hospitals need to focus on improving how well staff follow these guidelines.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_15862188
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2025
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Addressing and Reducing the Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP) Vs Ventilator Bundle in Intensive Care Units - An Review
Paramasivam Asari Geetha
Dr. Mohan Rao
Dr. Subala
<p>Background: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common infection that can happen in hospitals, especially in intensive care units. Following proper guidelines to prevent VAP helps reduce infections and improves how patients recover.</p> <p>Aim: This study looked at how often VAP occurred, how well nurses followed the VAP care steps (called Ventilator bundle), and whether this affected patient outcomes.</p> <p> Study Design: This was a Quantitative study. It included ICU patients who were on ventilators for at least 48 hours..</p> <p>Results: Out of 100 patients, 22.3% developed VAP. The infection rate was 5.6 per 1,000 ventilator days. Nurses followed the VAP care bundle 69% of the time, but this decreased over the hospital stay. Higher nurse compliance was linked to:  Shorter hospital stays  Fewer days on a ventilator  Lower hospital costs Patients  who did not get VAP had better nurse compliance (average 72.9%) than those who did get VAP (average 56.6%).</p> <p>Conclusions: Better nurse compliance with VAP guidelines leads to improved patient outcomes. Hospitals need to focus on improving how well staff follow these guidelines.</p>
title Addressing and Reducing the Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP) Vs Ventilator Bundle in Intensive Care Units - An Review
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15862188