Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Recurso digital |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| Publicado: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16423737 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866902290543149056 |
|---|---|
| author | Wei, Xinliang |
| author_facet | Wei, Xinliang |
| contents | <p>This white paper proposes a new legal and linguistic framework—<span><strong>Rhythmic Expression Rights (RER)</strong></span>—to address the emerging challenges posed by AI-driven expressive behavior. As AI systems increasingly imitate <span><strong>structure</strong></span>, <span><strong>style</strong></span>, and <span><strong>rhythm</strong></span> rather than copying traditional content, existing intellectual property laws face a critical structural blind spot.</p> <p>Building on the triadic model of <span><strong>SER (Structured Expression Resonance)</strong></span>, <span><strong>CSL (Collaborative Structural Linguistics)</strong></span>, and <span><strong>Rhythm OS</strong></span>, this work introduces a cross-domain language protocol that enables rhythm to be:</p> <ul> <li> <p>Cognitively identified (via SER),</p> </li> <li> <p>Structurally declared and traced (via CSL),</p> </li> <li> <p>Executed and contractually embedded (via Rhythm OS).</p> </li> </ul> <p>It argues that <span><strong>expression sovereignty is shifting</strong></span> from content to rhythm—and that rhythm must be recognized as a legally claimable unit of authorship and responsibility. This white paper presents not only a conceptual contribution but also an executable model for <span><strong>future-compatible expressive rights</strong></span> in law, technology, and human–AI collaboration.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_16423737 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Rhythm OS Whitepaper 03 | Rhythmic Expression Rights: When Law Begins to Hear the Structure of Collaboration Wei, Xinliang Rhythmic Expression Rights Structured Expression Resonance SER Collaborative Structural Linguistics CSL Rhythm OS AI-generated content Intellectual property Expressive sovereignty Expressive sovereignty Legal interfaces Language protocols Human–AI collaboration Cognitive rhythm Style mimicry Authorship traceability Multimodal expression Creative rights Artificial Intelligence Human–Computer Interaction Intellectual Property Law Computational Linguistics Cognitive Science Legal Informatics Digital Media Theory Communication Protocols Creative Technology Digital Humanities Language and Law Media Studies Technology Ethics <p>This white paper proposes a new legal and linguistic framework—<span><strong>Rhythmic Expression Rights (RER)</strong></span>—to address the emerging challenges posed by AI-driven expressive behavior. As AI systems increasingly imitate <span><strong>structure</strong></span>, <span><strong>style</strong></span>, and <span><strong>rhythm</strong></span> rather than copying traditional content, existing intellectual property laws face a critical structural blind spot.</p> <p>Building on the triadic model of <span><strong>SER (Structured Expression Resonance)</strong></span>, <span><strong>CSL (Collaborative Structural Linguistics)</strong></span>, and <span><strong>Rhythm OS</strong></span>, this work introduces a cross-domain language protocol that enables rhythm to be:</p> <ul> <li> <p>Cognitively identified (via SER),</p> </li> <li> <p>Structurally declared and traced (via CSL),</p> </li> <li> <p>Executed and contractually embedded (via Rhythm OS).</p> </li> </ul> <p>It argues that <span><strong>expression sovereignty is shifting</strong></span> from content to rhythm—and that rhythm must be recognized as a legally claimable unit of authorship and responsibility. This white paper presents not only a conceptual contribution but also an executable model for <span><strong>future-compatible expressive rights</strong></span> in law, technology, and human–AI collaboration.</p> |
| title | Rhythm OS Whitepaper 03 | Rhythmic Expression Rights: When Law Begins to Hear the Structure of Collaboration |
| topic | Rhythmic Expression Rights Structured Expression Resonance SER Collaborative Structural Linguistics CSL Rhythm OS AI-generated content Intellectual property Expressive sovereignty Expressive sovereignty Legal interfaces Language protocols Human–AI collaboration Cognitive rhythm Style mimicry Authorship traceability Multimodal expression Creative rights Artificial Intelligence Human–Computer Interaction Intellectual Property Law Computational Linguistics Cognitive Science Legal Informatics Digital Media Theory Communication Protocols Creative Technology Digital Humanities Language and Law Media Studies Technology Ethics |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16423737 |