Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16744714 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- <p>Supplementary Materials – Article Submission to RBRH <br>Author: Matheus Vinícius Ferreira; Diego Rodrigues Macedo; Antônio Pereira Magalhães Junior<br>Article Title: Divergent Frameworks, Shared Challenges: A Comparative Analysis of National and State Water Security Plans in Minas Gerais, Brazil <br>Date: August 2025 </p> <p>This folder contains supplementary material related to the manuscript submitted to the Brazilian Journal of Water Resources (RBRH). It includes: <br>- An Excel spreadsheet with the original variables used in the construction of the ISH and IGP indices (prior to spatial aggregation), <br>- Three figures illustrating the statistical correlation between ISH and IGP, <br>- Five shapefiles used in the spatial analysis of water security.</p> <p>-------------------------------------------------------------<br>1. Excel File<br>-------------------------------------------------------------</p> <p>- ISH_PMSH_Variables.xlsx <br> → Spreadsheet containing the **original variables** used in the construction of the Water Security Index (ISH) and in the PMSH prioritization analysis via the IGP. These data represent indicator-level values **before municipal aggregation** and are organized by original analytical units.</p> <p>-------------------------------------------------------------<br>2. Figures<br>-------------------------------------------------------------</p> <p>- ISH_IGP_Correlation_Mean.jpg <br> → Scatter plot showing the correlation between the **mean** values of the ISH and IGP indices. <br> Equation: y = 0.0204x + 3.8775 <br> R² = 0.0057</p> <p>- ISH_IGP_Correlation_Median.jpg <br> → Scatter plot showing the correlation between the **median** values of the ISH and IGP indices. <br> Equation: y = 0.0156x + 3.9425 <br> R² = 0.0033</p> <p>- ISH_IGP_Correlation_Mode.jpg <br> → Scatter plot showing the correlation between the **mode** values of the ISH and IGP indices. <br> Equation: y = 0.0507x + 3.7813 <br> R² = 0.0328</p> <p>-------------------------------------------------------------<br>3. Shapefiles<br>-------------------------------------------------------------</p> <p>Each folder contains a complete set of shapefile components (.shp, .shx, .dbf, .prj). All spatial layers are projected in **SIRGAS 2000 (EPSG: 4674)**.</p> <p>- /ISH_2017/ <br> → Original ISH values for the year 2017, calculated and mapped by **ottobacias**.</p> <p>- /ISH_2035/ <br> → Projected ISH values for the year 2035, by **ottobacias**.</p> <p>- /ISH_standardized/ <br> → Standardized ISH values **converted to the municipal scale** for comparative analysis.</p> <p>- /IGP_standardized/ <br> → Standardized IGP values **converted to the municipal scale**, representing PMSH priority classification.</p> <p>- /PMSH_IGP_components/ <br> → Spatial layers of the IGP index and its components used in the PMSH, represented by **aggregated planning units (Unidades Agregadas)**.</p> <p>-------------------------------------------------------------</p> <p>All data and figures are original and were used to support the spatial and statistical analyses presented in the manuscript. For further information, please contact the corresponding author.</p> <p>End of README</p>