Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Malviya, Dilip Kumar, Khare, Poonam
Format: Recurso digital
Language:
Published: Zenodo 2025
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16871983
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866902330526400512
author Malviya, Dilip Kumar
Khare, Poonam
author_facet Malviya, Dilip Kumar
Khare, Poonam
contents <p><strong><span>Microbial wastewater treatment is a cornerstone of modern environmental engineering, with both indigenous and genetically engineered microbes playing pivotal roles. This study explores the comparative efficacy of native microbial communities versus engineered strains in degrading pollutants in municipal and industrial wastewater. Indigenous microbes, naturally adapted to local environmental conditions, exhibit broad resilience and stability, while engineered microbes are tailored for enhanced degradation of specific pollutants such as heavy metals, pharmaceuticals, and nitrogen compounds. Through controlled bioreactor experiments and field studies, this research examines pollutant removal efficiency, microbial survival, system stability, and overall ecological impacts. Our findings reveal that while indigenous microbes are more robust under fluctuating environmental conditions, engineered microbes demonstrate superior performance in targeted degradation tasks when environmental parameters are tightly controlled. However, the integration of both microbial types offers a promising hybrid approach to maximize pollutant removal. This study emphasizes the importance of context in selecting microbial strategies for wastewater treatment, advocating for tailored applications based on pollution load, regulatory needs, and environmental resilience. The results support the broader transition toward biologically intelligent wastewater treatment systems that leverage microbial diversity and synthetic biology. Ultimately, this research informs future developments in sustainable wastewater management practices globally.</span></strong></p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_16871983
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2025
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle A Comparative Study of Indigenous vs. Engineered Microbes in Wastewater Treatment
Malviya, Dilip Kumar
Khare, Poonam
<p><strong><span>Microbial wastewater treatment is a cornerstone of modern environmental engineering, with both indigenous and genetically engineered microbes playing pivotal roles. This study explores the comparative efficacy of native microbial communities versus engineered strains in degrading pollutants in municipal and industrial wastewater. Indigenous microbes, naturally adapted to local environmental conditions, exhibit broad resilience and stability, while engineered microbes are tailored for enhanced degradation of specific pollutants such as heavy metals, pharmaceuticals, and nitrogen compounds. Through controlled bioreactor experiments and field studies, this research examines pollutant removal efficiency, microbial survival, system stability, and overall ecological impacts. Our findings reveal that while indigenous microbes are more robust under fluctuating environmental conditions, engineered microbes demonstrate superior performance in targeted degradation tasks when environmental parameters are tightly controlled. However, the integration of both microbial types offers a promising hybrid approach to maximize pollutant removal. This study emphasizes the importance of context in selecting microbial strategies for wastewater treatment, advocating for tailored applications based on pollution load, regulatory needs, and environmental resilience. The results support the broader transition toward biologically intelligent wastewater treatment systems that leverage microbial diversity and synthetic biology. Ultimately, this research informs future developments in sustainable wastewater management practices globally.</span></strong></p>
title A Comparative Study of Indigenous vs. Engineered Microbes in Wastewater Treatment
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16871983