Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso digital |
| Lingua: | |
| Pubblicazione: |
Zenodo
2020
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16922369 |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
Sommario:
- <p>Sidalcea asprella Greene subsp. elegans (Greene) Halse, comb. nov.</p><p><i>Sidalcea elegans</i> Greene,Cybele Columb. 1:35.1914. <i>Sidalcea malviflora</i> (DC.) A. Gray subsp. <i>elegans</i> (Greene) C.L. Hitchc., Univ. Wash. Publ. Biol. 18:27. 1957 (as ‘ <i>malvaeflora</i> ’).</p><p>TYPE: U.S.A. OREGON. Josephine Co.: Eight Dollar Mountain, 12 Jun 1904, <i>C.V.Piper 6171</i> (HOLOTYPE: US-00098128).</p><p><i>Sidalcea virgata</i> Howell, an Oregon endemic, has had a less checkered past. It has been considered a species by Piper and Beattie (1915), Roush (1931), Peck (1941, 1961), Wiggins (1951) and by the <i>Flora of the Pacific Northwest</i> (Hitchcock & Cronquist 2018). Hitchcock (1957) called it a subspecies of <i>S. malviflora</i> and Dimling (1991) called it a variety of <i>S. malviflora.</i></p><p>The position of <i>Sidalcea virgata</i> in Andreasen and Baldwin’s (2003) phylogenetic study is unresolved. However,it does appear to be part of a large clade which contains <i>S.asprella,</i> but not <i>S.malviflora.</i> Morphological examination of <i>S. virgata</i> and <i>S.asprella</i> throughout their range in Oregon leads to the conclusion that <i>S.virgata</i> should be treated as a subspecies of <i>S. asprella</i> requiring a new combination.</p>