A Re-evaluation of Hominin Depilation Timing: A Late Pleistocene Hypothesis Based on Interdisciplinary Evidence Integration

Fuente: Zenodo
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Duan, Shiqiang
Format: Recurso digital
Langue:anglais
Publié: Zenodo 2025
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866901753250709504
author Duan, Shiqiang
author_facet Duan, Shiqiang
contents <p><span lang="EN-US">The prevailing 'deep-time' hypothesis, which places hominin depilation at 1.2 Mya as an adaptation for endurance running, suffers from profound incongruities with multidisciplinary evidence.This paper challenges this established view through a critical, interdisciplinary synthesis of the available evidence. We systematically deconstruct the substantial discrepancies within molecular clock analyses (e.g., a >400% variance in chronologies derived from the MC1R gene), the indirect and equivocal nature of paleopathological data, and the million-year "technological vacuum" separating the proposed depilation event from the advent of critical enabling technologies, including portable water apparatus, tailored clothing, and structured hearths. In response to these evidentiary conflicts, we propose an alternative theoretical framework, which we term the "Late Pleistocene Survival Strategy Hypothesis." This hypothesis posits that hominin depilation was not an event of deep antiquity but a far more recent adaptive phenomenon of the Late Pleistocene (ca. 100-50 kya). Its principal driver was the extreme thermoregulatory stress imposed by high-frequency, long-distance "day-roundtrip" locomotion—a behavioral necessity dictated by the expansion of foraging radii following megafaunal decline, a shift biomechanically reflected in the hominin skeleton. This profound physiological transformation was contingent upon a crucial "cultural-technological compensation package," encompassing proficient pyrotechnology and innovations in clothing and hydrational logistics. This model not only offers a more parsimonious unification of disparate evidence but also presents a novel heuristic for interpreting the Agricultural Revolution: not as a teleological "progression," but as a strategic "adaptive retreat" from a collapsed, high-expenditure subsistence regime.</span></p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_17082165
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2025
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle A Re-evaluation of Hominin Depilation Timing: A Late Pleistocene Hypothesis Based on Interdisciplinary Evidence Integration
Duan, Shiqiang
Human Evolution
Depilation
Forced Running
MC1R
Molecular Clock
Late Pleistocene
Endurance Running Hypothesis
Eyed Needle
Ostrich Eggshell Flask
Agricultural Revolution
<p><span lang="EN-US">The prevailing 'deep-time' hypothesis, which places hominin depilation at 1.2 Mya as an adaptation for endurance running, suffers from profound incongruities with multidisciplinary evidence.This paper challenges this established view through a critical, interdisciplinary synthesis of the available evidence. We systematically deconstruct the substantial discrepancies within molecular clock analyses (e.g., a >400% variance in chronologies derived from the MC1R gene), the indirect and equivocal nature of paleopathological data, and the million-year "technological vacuum" separating the proposed depilation event from the advent of critical enabling technologies, including portable water apparatus, tailored clothing, and structured hearths. In response to these evidentiary conflicts, we propose an alternative theoretical framework, which we term the "Late Pleistocene Survival Strategy Hypothesis." This hypothesis posits that hominin depilation was not an event of deep antiquity but a far more recent adaptive phenomenon of the Late Pleistocene (ca. 100-50 kya). Its principal driver was the extreme thermoregulatory stress imposed by high-frequency, long-distance "day-roundtrip" locomotion—a behavioral necessity dictated by the expansion of foraging radii following megafaunal decline, a shift biomechanically reflected in the hominin skeleton. This profound physiological transformation was contingent upon a crucial "cultural-technological compensation package," encompassing proficient pyrotechnology and innovations in clothing and hydrational logistics. This model not only offers a more parsimonious unification of disparate evidence but also presents a novel heuristic for interpreting the Agricultural Revolution: not as a teleological "progression," but as a strategic "adaptive retreat" from a collapsed, high-expenditure subsistence regime.</span></p>
title A Re-evaluation of Hominin Depilation Timing: A Late Pleistocene Hypothesis Based on Interdisciplinary Evidence Integration
topic Human Evolution
Depilation
Forced Running
MC1R
Molecular Clock
Late Pleistocene
Endurance Running Hypothesis
Eyed Needle
Ostrich Eggshell Flask
Agricultural Revolution
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17082165