Assessing Local Government's Delivery of Public Parks: A Case Study of San Francisco

Fuente: Zenodo
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Gorbunova, Daria
Natura: Recurso digital
Pubblicazione: Zenodo 2025
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866902024062238720
author Gorbunova, Daria
author_facet Gorbunova, Daria
contents <p>This article investigates how local government in San Francisco delivers and maintains public parks, analyzing the city’s capacity, funding strategies, and governance structures. Drawing on the 2022 Park Maintenance Standards Report and concepts of environmental governance, the study evaluates successes and disparities across neighborhoods. Findings highlight the city’s diversified funding through general funds, bonds, grants, and philanthropy, alongside challenges of inequity in “Equity Zones” disproportionately affected by environmental risks. The paper also considers the importance of legitimacy and public perception, arguing that stronger community engagement and strategic maintenance are essential for sustainable park management. Recommendations include prioritizing underserved areas, fostering partnerships, embracing real-time reporting technologies, and adopting preventative, data-driven maintenance approaches. The case illustrates how parks embody broader issues of equity, governance capacity, and environmental justice in urban policy.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_17122579
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2025
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Assessing Local Government's Delivery of Public Parks: A Case Study of San Francisco
Gorbunova, Daria
<p>This article investigates how local government in San Francisco delivers and maintains public parks, analyzing the city’s capacity, funding strategies, and governance structures. Drawing on the 2022 Park Maintenance Standards Report and concepts of environmental governance, the study evaluates successes and disparities across neighborhoods. Findings highlight the city’s diversified funding through general funds, bonds, grants, and philanthropy, alongside challenges of inequity in “Equity Zones” disproportionately affected by environmental risks. The paper also considers the importance of legitimacy and public perception, arguing that stronger community engagement and strategic maintenance are essential for sustainable park management. Recommendations include prioritizing underserved areas, fostering partnerships, embracing real-time reporting technologies, and adopting preventative, data-driven maintenance approaches. The case illustrates how parks embody broader issues of equity, governance capacity, and environmental justice in urban policy.</p>
title Assessing Local Government's Delivery of Public Parks: A Case Study of San Francisco
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17122579