Toward an Intuitive Interpretation of Gauge Fields: Cross-Sectional Differences and Spherical Analysis

Fuente: Zenodo
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Konno, Tetsuo
Format: Recurso digital
Langue:anglais
Publié: Zenodo 2025
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866902143585222656
author Konno, Tetsuo
author_facet Konno, Tetsuo
contents <p>This paper proposes an intuitive reinterpretation of the gauge field equation</p> <p>                                                            </p> <p>Mathematically, <span><span>FμνF_{\mu\nu}</span><span><span><span><span>F</span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span>μν</span></span></span></span><span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span> is defined as the antisymmetric derivative of a potential field, but its connection to real structures is not always clear. Here, we describe the gauge field as the <strong>difference between gradients observed when slicing a potential in orthogonal directions</strong>. If both views coincide (<span><span>Fμν=0</span></span>), the system is symmetric and structureless; if they differ, asymmetry appears, and a field emerges.</p> <p>To illustrate, an onion cut concentrically preserves symmetry and releases no liquid, whereas orthogonal cuts introduce asymmetry and cause fluid to spread. This “onion analogy” clarifies gauge fields as structural distortions. Moreover, spherical analysis—considering concentric shells—is argued to be more realistic than planar cross-sections for many systems, such as Earth’s gravitational field, electron closed surfaces, and biological enclosures.</p> <p>By treating gauge fields as <strong>asymmetry detectors</strong> and employing spherical analysis, this work provides a more intuitive bridge between mathematical formalisms and observable reality, making gauge curvature easier to understand across physics and applied sciences.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_17150514
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2025
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Toward an Intuitive Interpretation of Gauge Fields: Cross-Sectional Differences and Spherical Analysis
Konno, Tetsuo
Gauge field
Asymmetry
Cross-sectional difference
Spherical analysis
Intuitive physics
Closed surfaces
<p>This paper proposes an intuitive reinterpretation of the gauge field equation</p> <p>                                                            </p> <p>Mathematically, <span><span>FμνF_{\mu\nu}</span><span><span><span><span>F</span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span>μν</span></span></span></span><span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span> is defined as the antisymmetric derivative of a potential field, but its connection to real structures is not always clear. Here, we describe the gauge field as the <strong>difference between gradients observed when slicing a potential in orthogonal directions</strong>. If both views coincide (<span><span>Fμν=0</span></span>), the system is symmetric and structureless; if they differ, asymmetry appears, and a field emerges.</p> <p>To illustrate, an onion cut concentrically preserves symmetry and releases no liquid, whereas orthogonal cuts introduce asymmetry and cause fluid to spread. This “onion analogy” clarifies gauge fields as structural distortions. Moreover, spherical analysis—considering concentric shells—is argued to be more realistic than planar cross-sections for many systems, such as Earth’s gravitational field, electron closed surfaces, and biological enclosures.</p> <p>By treating gauge fields as <strong>asymmetry detectors</strong> and employing spherical analysis, this work provides a more intuitive bridge between mathematical formalisms and observable reality, making gauge curvature easier to understand across physics and applied sciences.</p>
title Toward an Intuitive Interpretation of Gauge Fields: Cross-Sectional Differences and Spherical Analysis
topic Gauge field
Asymmetry
Cross-sectional difference
Spherical analysis
Intuitive physics
Closed surfaces
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17150514