| _version_ | 1866902019503030272 |
|---|---|
| author | Jasmin, Hilary Whitney, Rachel Maloney, Molly Divis, Deborah Bullers, Krystal Carlson, Rebecca Gorman, Emily |
| author_facet | Jasmin, Hilary Whitney, Rachel Maloney, Molly Divis, Deborah Bullers, Krystal Carlson, Rebecca Gorman, Emily |
| contents | <p>ABSTRACT:</p> <p><span>OBJECTIVE: To develop, test, and validate a comprehensive search hedge for research regarding pharmacy education.</span></p> <p><span>METHODS: The hedge was originally inspired by an author’s LibGuide and modifications were co-created by a research team that imagined that the hedge could be improved to achieve maximum sensitivity. A title search for pharmacy education systematic reviews was undertaken to discover papers that should be captured by a sensitive search hedge. Review articles were screened in Covidence under dual review, with a tie-breaking third reviewer for conflicts. During screening, special attention was given to the search strategies each review employed. High-quality reviews were used to extract primary studies which built a corpus of 100 PMIDs, which were used to evaluate and measure the relative recall of the search hedge.</span></p> <p><span>RESULTS: 100% relative recall was achieved across PubMed/Medline, Ovid/Medline, EBSCO/Medline, and Elsevier/Embase.</span></p> <p><span>CONCLUSIONS: This hedge, after undergoing the validation process, can be trusted to yield highly relevant results for librarians and other researchers in the pharmacy education field.</span></p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_17195531 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Imagining and validating a high-sensitivity pharmacy education hedge Jasmin, Hilary Whitney, Rachel Maloney, Molly Divis, Deborah Bullers, Krystal Carlson, Rebecca Gorman, Emily Education, Pharmacy Search Hedge Evidence Synthesis Search Strategy <p>ABSTRACT:</p> <p><span>OBJECTIVE: To develop, test, and validate a comprehensive search hedge for research regarding pharmacy education.</span></p> <p><span>METHODS: The hedge was originally inspired by an author’s LibGuide and modifications were co-created by a research team that imagined that the hedge could be improved to achieve maximum sensitivity. A title search for pharmacy education systematic reviews was undertaken to discover papers that should be captured by a sensitive search hedge. Review articles were screened in Covidence under dual review, with a tie-breaking third reviewer for conflicts. During screening, special attention was given to the search strategies each review employed. High-quality reviews were used to extract primary studies which built a corpus of 100 PMIDs, which were used to evaluate and measure the relative recall of the search hedge.</span></p> <p><span>RESULTS: 100% relative recall was achieved across PubMed/Medline, Ovid/Medline, EBSCO/Medline, and Elsevier/Embase.</span></p> <p><span>CONCLUSIONS: This hedge, after undergoing the validation process, can be trusted to yield highly relevant results for librarians and other researchers in the pharmacy education field.</span></p> |
| title | Imagining and validating a high-sensitivity pharmacy education hedge |
| topic | Education, Pharmacy Search Hedge Evidence Synthesis Search Strategy |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17195531 |