Cover Image

Imagining and validating a high-sensitivity pharmacy education hedge

Fuente: Zenodo

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Jasmin, Hilary, Whitney, Rachel, Maloney, Molly, Divis, Deborah, Bullers, Krystal, Carlson, Rebecca, Gorman, Emily
Format:	Recurso digital
Language:	English
Published:	Zenodo 2025
Subjects:	Education, Pharmacy Search Hedge Evidence Synthesis Search Strategy
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Development of pharmacy competency framework for the changing demands of Thailand’s pharmaceutical and health services
by: Puckwipa Suwannaprom
Published: (2020)

Coproducing a Cochrane Qualitative Evidence Synthesis: Process, Outcomes, and Reflections on Power
by: Bronwen Merner, et al.
Published: (2025)

Common statistical errors in systematic reviews: A tutorial
by: Afroditi Kanellopoulou, et al.
Published: (2025)

Standardized mean differences in meta‐analysis: A tutorial
by: Daniel Gallardo‐Gómez, et al.
Published: (2024)

Harnessing Large‐Language Models for Efficient Data Extraction in Systematic Reviews: The Role of Prompt Engineering
by: Molly Murton, et al.
Published: (2025)

Ninety‐Seven Percent of Trials Investigating Robotic Interventions in Physiotherapy Contained Abstract Spin: A Meta‐Research Review
by: Hilary Tier, et al.
Published: (2026)

Creating Interactive Data Dashboards for Evidence Syntheses
by: Leslie A. Perdue, et al.
Published: (2025)

Single‐arm interventional versus observational studies for assessing efficacy: A meta‐epidemiological study
by: Mary Chappell, et al.
Published: (2025)

Promoting the Implementation of Co‐Produced Cochrane Evidence: An Exploratory Study of Improving Partnering With Consumers
by: Bronwen Merner, et al.
Published: (2026)

Systematic reviews of clinical laboratory studies: Pilot risk of bias tool developed by consensus
by: Tilly Fox, et al.
Published: (2024)

Certainty of evidence assessment in high‐impact medical journals: A meta‐epidemiological survey
by: Madelin R. Siedler, et al.
Published: (2025)

The Technology of Evidence-Based Practice: Tools for Navigating the Health Sciences Literature
by: Townsend, Whitney
Published: (2011)

Artificial Intelligence Search Tools for Evidence Synthesis: Comparative Analysis and Implementation Recommendations
by: Robin Featherstone, et al.
Published: (2025)

Incorporating uncertainty in the baseline risk: An R Shiny tool and an empirical study
by: M. Hassan Murad, et al.
Published: (2025)

Systematic Reviews as Part of Doctoral Theses and for the Promotion to Associate Professor: A Descriptive Study of University Policies in Sweden
by: Martin Ringsten, et al.
Published: (2026)

Trustworthiness assessment of published clinical trials: Literature review of domains and questions
by: Zarko Alfirevic, et al.
Published: (2024)

What are the methodological characteristics of evidence and gap maps? A systematic review and evidence and gap map
by: Mary Fredlund, et al.
Published: (2024)

RETRACTED: Human‐in‐the‐Loop Artificial Intelligence System for Systematic Literature Review: Methods and Validations for the AutoLit Review Software
by: Kevin M. Kallmes, et al.
Published: (2025)

Issue Information
Published: (2024)

Analysis of Cochrane systematic reviews: A comprehensive study of impact and influence from 1998 to 2024
by: Amin Sharifan
Published: (2024)

Development of a topic‐specific bibliographic database supporting the updates of SPIRIT 2013 and CONSORT 2010
by: Lasse Østengaard, et al.
Published: (2024)

Inclusion, characteristics and methodological limitations of systematic reviews in doctoral theses: A cross‐sectional study of all universities in Sweden
by: M. Ringsten, et al.
Published: (2025)

Multiple Long‐Term Conditions, Co‐Long‐Term Conditions and Polyvascular Disease: Considerations for Evidence Synthesis and Meta‐Analyses
by: Gillian Mead, et al.
Published: (2025)

Issue Information
Published: (2026)

Issue Information
Published: (2024)

Issue Information
Published: (2024)

Issue Information
Published: (2025)

Using a Large Language Model (ChatGPT‐4o) to Assess the Risk of Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials of Medical Interventions: Interrater Agreement With Human Reviewers
by: Christopher James Rose, et al.
Published: (2025)

A New Process Model of Study Identification Specific to the Identification of Randomised Studies for Systematic Reviews of Medical Interventions
by: Chris Cooper, et al.
Published: (2025)

Correction to “Artificial Intelligence and Automation in Evidence Synthesis: An Investigation of Methods Employed in Cochrane, Campbell Collaboration, and Environmental Evidence Reviews,” “Creating Interactive Data Dashboards for Evidence Syntheses,” and “Using GPT‐4 for Title and Abstract Screening in a Literature Review of Public Policies: A Feasibility Study”
Published: (2026)

Using Large Language Models to Address Contextual Questions in Systematic Reviews
by: Susanne Hempel, et al.
Published: (2026)

Sensitivity Analysis in Meta‐Analysis: A Tutorial
by: Nyan Min Aung, et al.
Published: (2026)

Correction to “Standardized mean differences in meta‐analysis: A tutorial”
Published: (2024)

Methods of Engaging Interest‐Holders in Healthcare Evidence Syntheses: A Scoping Review
by: Alex Todhunter‐Brown, et al.
Published: (2026)

Do We Need Systematic Reviews of Research Priority Setting? A Proposal for a New Concept on Conducting Systematic Reviews of Research Priority Setting Exercises
by: Mona Nasser, et al.
Published: (2026)

Guidance for systematic reviews in journal author instructions: Findings and recommendations for editorial teams
by: Nele S. Pauwels, et al.
Published: (2024)

Issue Information
Published: (2025)

A scoping review: Screening questionnaires for identifying tanning addiction
by: John Meisenheimer, et al.
Published: (2024)

Quality of systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in dermatology
by: Annapoorani Muthiah, et al.
Published: (2024)

Count data, rates, rate differences, and rate ratios in meta‐analysis: A tutorial
by: Christopher James Rose, et al.
Published: (2025)