Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2024
|
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17205452 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866902258284756992 |
|---|---|
| author | Pawankumar Suresh |
| author_facet | Pawankumar Suresh |
| contents | <p>Quality by Design (QbD) concepts at the program level can provide a framework for systematically charting the design space products into an actual program prioritization process. The QbD deliverables like control strategies, risk-based monitoring systems and knowledge translation processes and how these correspond to milestones-based portfolio management enable companies to achieve efficiencies, innovations and compliance. Implementation of data-driven solutions, stage-gate methods, and visualization systems is crucial to QbD deliverables alignment with resources as well as overall long-term program strategy. Industrial uses in the pharmaceutical, aerospace, engineering, information systems, and numerous others show how design space exploration and utility-based prioritization models underpin governance, deliver organizational agility and value. Here in this paper, I am proposing the conceptual framework between QbD outputs and more accurate portfolio level decision-making, with more accurate milestones, reducing operation risks and enhancing compliance with emerging market and regulatory pressures. Industry flexibility is about this topic where a flexible framework is offered on utilization of the QbD for managing strategic portfolios.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_17205452 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Program-Level QbD: Translating Design Space into Portfolio Prioritization Pawankumar Suresh <p>Quality by Design (QbD) concepts at the program level can provide a framework for systematically charting the design space products into an actual program prioritization process. The QbD deliverables like control strategies, risk-based monitoring systems and knowledge translation processes and how these correspond to milestones-based portfolio management enable companies to achieve efficiencies, innovations and compliance. Implementation of data-driven solutions, stage-gate methods, and visualization systems is crucial to QbD deliverables alignment with resources as well as overall long-term program strategy. Industrial uses in the pharmaceutical, aerospace, engineering, information systems, and numerous others show how design space exploration and utility-based prioritization models underpin governance, deliver organizational agility and value. Here in this paper, I am proposing the conceptual framework between QbD outputs and more accurate portfolio level decision-making, with more accurate milestones, reducing operation risks and enhancing compliance with emerging market and regulatory pressures. Industry flexibility is about this topic where a flexible framework is offered on utilization of the QbD for managing strategic portfolios.</p> |
| title | Program-Level QbD: Translating Design Space into Portfolio Prioritization |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17205452 |