Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2024
|
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17205452 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- <p>Quality by Design (QbD) concepts at the program level can provide a framework for systematically charting the design space products into an actual program prioritization process. The QbD deliverables like control strategies, risk-based monitoring systems and knowledge translation processes and how these correspond to milestones-based portfolio management enable companies to achieve efficiencies, innovations and compliance. Implementation of data-driven solutions, stage-gate methods, and visualization systems is crucial to QbD deliverables alignment with resources as well as overall long-term program strategy. Industrial uses in the pharmaceutical, aerospace, engineering, information systems, and numerous others show how design space exploration and utility-based prioritization models underpin governance, deliver organizational agility and value. Here in this paper, I am proposing the conceptual framework between QbD outputs and more accurate portfolio level decision-making, with more accurate milestones, reducing operation risks and enhancing compliance with emerging market and regulatory pressures. Industry flexibility is about this topic where a flexible framework is offered on utilization of the QbD for managing strategic portfolios.</p>