Additivity Symmetry III: The Activation Theorem

Fuente: Zenodo
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Treppiedi, Attilio
Natura: Recurso digital
Lingua:inglese
Pubblicazione: Zenodo 2025
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866902042443776000
author Treppiedi, Attilio
author_facet Treppiedi, Attilio
contents <p></p> <div> <div> <div>Translator</div> <div> </div> <div> </div> </div> <div> <div> </div> <div> </div> </div> </div> <p> </p> <p>This paper develops the third part of the <em>Additivity Symmetry</em> program. Additivity Symmetry is the principle that physical descriptions remain stable under additive composition (“gluing”) of independent experimental blocks. In earlier work (<em>Additivity Symmetry I: Conceptual Framework and The Additivity Algebra</em>; <em>Additivity Symmetry II: Closure Regimes</em>), this principle was shown to generate the familiar regimes of physics (quantum, statistical, discrete) and was reformulated as closure under all additive automorphisms, revealing a universal set of admissibility requirements.</p> <p>In this work, we prove the <strong>Activation Theorem</strong>: closure under all additive automorphisms is equivalent to the activation of three structural constraints—boundary/fall-off (B), Euler–Lagrange admissibility (E), and gauge/regularity (G). A fourth principle, finiteness, is not required for the equivalence but is conjectured to hold operationally as a sieve at finite detector resolution. This sieve upgrades heuristic parallels (to operator algebras, representation theory, TQFT) into exact mathematical correspondences.</p> <p>The paper also develops the operational role of probes, which act as projectors that enforce but do not generate constraints, and analyzes implications across quantum, statistical, and discrete regimes. It suggests that finite-resolution effects could yield controlled deviations from textbook predictions at the resolution limits of experiments, opening the way for new empirical tests.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_17215020
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2025
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Additivity Symmetry III: The Activation Theorem
Treppiedi, Attilio
Additivity Symmetry
Activation Theorem
closure
structural constraint
euler-lagrange admissability
boundary conditions
gauge regularity
sieve conjecture
finite resolution probes
quantum regimes
stastical mechanics
discrete regimes
representation theory
operator algebras
topological quantum field theory (TQFT)
<p></p> <div> <div> <div>Translator</div> <div> </div> <div> </div> </div> <div> <div> </div> <div> </div> </div> </div> <p> </p> <p>This paper develops the third part of the <em>Additivity Symmetry</em> program. Additivity Symmetry is the principle that physical descriptions remain stable under additive composition (“gluing”) of independent experimental blocks. In earlier work (<em>Additivity Symmetry I: Conceptual Framework and The Additivity Algebra</em>; <em>Additivity Symmetry II: Closure Regimes</em>), this principle was shown to generate the familiar regimes of physics (quantum, statistical, discrete) and was reformulated as closure under all additive automorphisms, revealing a universal set of admissibility requirements.</p> <p>In this work, we prove the <strong>Activation Theorem</strong>: closure under all additive automorphisms is equivalent to the activation of three structural constraints—boundary/fall-off (B), Euler–Lagrange admissibility (E), and gauge/regularity (G). A fourth principle, finiteness, is not required for the equivalence but is conjectured to hold operationally as a sieve at finite detector resolution. This sieve upgrades heuristic parallels (to operator algebras, representation theory, TQFT) into exact mathematical correspondences.</p> <p>The paper also develops the operational role of probes, which act as projectors that enforce but do not generate constraints, and analyzes implications across quantum, statistical, and discrete regimes. It suggests that finite-resolution effects could yield controlled deviations from textbook predictions at the resolution limits of experiments, opening the way for new empirical tests.</p>
title Additivity Symmetry III: The Activation Theorem
topic Additivity Symmetry
Activation Theorem
closure
structural constraint
euler-lagrange admissability
boundary conditions
gauge regularity
sieve conjecture
finite resolution probes
quantum regimes
stastical mechanics
discrete regimes
representation theory
operator algebras
topological quantum field theory (TQFT)
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17215020