Stethorrhagus archangelus Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994
Fuente:
Zenodo
Enregistré dans:
| Auteurs principaux: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Publié: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1866902113488994304 |
|---|---|
| author | Xavier, Cláudia Brescovit, Antonio D. Bonaldo, Alexandre B. |
| author_facet | Xavier, Cláudia Brescovit, Antonio D. Bonaldo, Alexandre B. |
| contents | <p><b><i>Stethorrhagus archangelus</i> Bonaldo & Brescovit, 1994</b></p><p>Figs 5–6, 49</p><p><i>Stethorrhagus archangelus</i> Bonaldo & Brescovit, 1994: 46, fig. 12a–e, ♂ ♀.</p><p><b>Diagnosis</b></p><p>Males of <i>S. archangelus</i> resemble those of <i>S. lupulus</i>, <i>S. latoma</i> and <i>S. oxossi</i> by the presence of a DTA and by the prolaterally inserted embolus (Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994: figs 11a–b, 12a–c, 13a–c). They differ from those of <i>S. lupulus</i> and <i>S. oxossi</i> by the SePP reduced to a small projection (Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994: fig. 12b) (SePP shouder-like in <i>S. lupulus</i> and <i>S. oxossi</i> – Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994: figs 10a, 11a) and from those of <i>S. latoma</i> by the TP1 relatively small, directed prolaterally, not covering the embolar base (Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994: fig. 12b) (TP1 directed apically, covering the embolar base in <i>S. latoma</i> – Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994: fig. 13a). Females are similar to those of <i>S. lupulus</i> and <i>S. oxossi</i> by the presence of a VEP (Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994: figs 10f, 11c, 12d). They differ from those of both these species by the CO circular and VEP round, not invaginated (Fig. 43C; Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994: fig. 12d–e) (CO slit-shaped; VEP invaginated in <i>S. lupulus</i> and <i>S. oxossi</i> – Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994: figs 10f, 11c).</p><p><b>Type material</b></p><p><b>Holotype</b></p><p>BRAZIL • ♂; Amazonas, São Gabriel da Cachoeira, Pico da Neblina; [0°24′40″ N, 65°54′28″ W]; 8 Nov. 1990; A.A. Lise leg; MCTP 1210.</p><p><b>Paratype</b></p><p>BRAZIL • 1 ♀; same data as for holotype; MCN 25461 (not re-examined).</p><p><b>Material examined</b> (new record)</p><p>BRAZIL – <b>Amazonas</b> • 1 ♂; same data as for holotype; elev. 1550 m; 1 Oct. 2007; D. Candiani leg.; MPEG 39922.</p><p><b>Description</b></p><p>Male and female, see Bonaldo & Brescovit (1994: 46). Additional documentation in Fig. 5.</p><p><b>Distribution</b></p><p>Known only from the type locality (Fig. 49).</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_17226727 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Stethorrhagus archangelus Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994 Xavier, Cláudia Brescovit, Antonio D. Bonaldo, Alexandre B. Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Arthropoda Arachnida Araneae Corinnidae Stethorrhagus Stethorrhagus archangelus <p><b><i>Stethorrhagus archangelus</i> Bonaldo & Brescovit, 1994</b></p><p>Figs 5–6, 49</p><p><i>Stethorrhagus archangelus</i> Bonaldo & Brescovit, 1994: 46, fig. 12a–e, ♂ ♀.</p><p><b>Diagnosis</b></p><p>Males of <i>S. archangelus</i> resemble those of <i>S. lupulus</i>, <i>S. latoma</i> and <i>S. oxossi</i> by the presence of a DTA and by the prolaterally inserted embolus (Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994: figs 11a–b, 12a–c, 13a–c). They differ from those of <i>S. lupulus</i> and <i>S. oxossi</i> by the SePP reduced to a small projection (Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994: fig. 12b) (SePP shouder-like in <i>S. lupulus</i> and <i>S. oxossi</i> – Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994: figs 10a, 11a) and from those of <i>S. latoma</i> by the TP1 relatively small, directed prolaterally, not covering the embolar base (Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994: fig. 12b) (TP1 directed apically, covering the embolar base in <i>S. latoma</i> – Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994: fig. 13a). Females are similar to those of <i>S. lupulus</i> and <i>S. oxossi</i> by the presence of a VEP (Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994: figs 10f, 11c, 12d). They differ from those of both these species by the CO circular and VEP round, not invaginated (Fig. 43C; Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994: fig. 12d–e) (CO slit-shaped; VEP invaginated in <i>S. lupulus</i> and <i>S. oxossi</i> – Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994: figs 10f, 11c).</p><p><b>Type material</b></p><p><b>Holotype</b></p><p>BRAZIL • ♂; Amazonas, São Gabriel da Cachoeira, Pico da Neblina; [0°24′40″ N, 65°54′28″ W]; 8 Nov. 1990; A.A. Lise leg; MCTP 1210.</p><p><b>Paratype</b></p><p>BRAZIL • 1 ♀; same data as for holotype; MCN 25461 (not re-examined).</p><p><b>Material examined</b> (new record)</p><p>BRAZIL – <b>Amazonas</b> • 1 ♂; same data as for holotype; elev. 1550 m; 1 Oct. 2007; D. Candiani leg.; MPEG 39922.</p><p><b>Description</b></p><p>Male and female, see Bonaldo & Brescovit (1994: 46). Additional documentation in Fig. 5.</p><p><b>Distribution</b></p><p>Known only from the type locality (Fig. 49).</p> |
| title | Stethorrhagus archangelus Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994 |
| topic | Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Arthropoda Arachnida Araneae Corinnidae Stethorrhagus Stethorrhagus archangelus |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17226727 |