Efficacy Of Early Cholecystectomy Versus Delayed Cholecystectomy In Acute Cholecystitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Fuente: Zenodo
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Dr. Vikash Meena
Natura: Recurso digital
Pubblicazione: Zenodo 2025
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866902130294521856
author Dr. Vikash Meena
author_facet Dr. Vikash Meena
contents <div> <div> <p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute cholecystitis is a common surgical emergency. The timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy—early versus delayed—remains a topic of debate, with implications for hospital stay, complications, and patient outcomes.</p> <p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy and outcomes of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis.</p> <p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted at RNT Medical College, Udaipur from February  2020 to  2021 February . A total of 60 patients diagnosed with acute cholecystitis were randomly assigned to early cholecystectomy (within 72 hours, n=30) or delayed cholecystectomy (6–8 weeks after conservative management, n=30). Primary outcomes included hospital stay, operative time, intraoperative difficulty, conversion to open surgery, postoperative complications, and readmissions. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 21; <em>p</em><0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>Early cholecystectomy significantly reduced hospital stay (4.2 ± 1.3 vs 7.5 ± 2.1 days, <em>p</em><0.05) and readmission rates compared to delayed surgery. There was no significant difference in operative time or conversion rates, though delayed cases showed slightly higher intraoperative difficulty. Postoperative complications were fewer in the early group (13.3% vs 26.7%).</p> <p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe, effective, and superior to delayed surgery in acute cholecystitis, offering reduced hospital stay, lower readmissions, and comparable operative outcomes. Early surgery should be preferred when feasible.</p> </div> </div> <div></div>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_17349737
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2025
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Efficacy Of Early Cholecystectomy Versus Delayed Cholecystectomy In Acute Cholecystitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Dr. Vikash Meena
<div> <div> <p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute cholecystitis is a common surgical emergency. The timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy—early versus delayed—remains a topic of debate, with implications for hospital stay, complications, and patient outcomes.</p> <p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy and outcomes of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis.</p> <p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted at RNT Medical College, Udaipur from February  2020 to  2021 February . A total of 60 patients diagnosed with acute cholecystitis were randomly assigned to early cholecystectomy (within 72 hours, n=30) or delayed cholecystectomy (6–8 weeks after conservative management, n=30). Primary outcomes included hospital stay, operative time, intraoperative difficulty, conversion to open surgery, postoperative complications, and readmissions. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 21; <em>p</em><0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>Early cholecystectomy significantly reduced hospital stay (4.2 ± 1.3 vs 7.5 ± 2.1 days, <em>p</em><0.05) and readmission rates compared to delayed surgery. There was no significant difference in operative time or conversion rates, though delayed cases showed slightly higher intraoperative difficulty. Postoperative complications were fewer in the early group (13.3% vs 26.7%).</p> <p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe, effective, and superior to delayed surgery in acute cholecystitis, offering reduced hospital stay, lower readmissions, and comparable operative outcomes. Early surgery should be preferred when feasible.</p> </div> </div> <div></div>
title Efficacy Of Early Cholecystectomy Versus Delayed Cholecystectomy In Acute Cholecystitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17349737