Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dakolo, Ineye Becky, Israel Jeremiah
Format: Recurso digital
Language:
Published: Zenodo 2025
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17496141
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866901741834862592
author Dakolo, Ineye Becky, Israel Jeremiah
author_facet Dakolo, Ineye Becky, Israel Jeremiah
contents <div>This study investigated and compared the utilization of family planning (FP) services among women in rural and urban areas of Bayelsa State, Nigeria. Data collected from 422 respondents revealed significant disparities in FP use between the two settings. Overall, 51.2% of women had ever used FP services, with higher utilization among urban women (63.5%) than rural women (38.9%). Current FP use was also greater in urban areas (54.0%) compared to rural areas (30.3%). The leading reason for non-use was the desire for more children (21.8%), followed by fear of side effects (19.0%) and lack of access (18.2%). Oral contraceptives were the most commonly used method (40.4%), and 77.0% of users reported regular use. The main motivator for adoption was perceived health benefits to mothers (37.0%). The findings highlight a clear urban advantage in FP utilization, emphasizing the need for improved rural access, awareness, and health service delivery.</div> <div> </div>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_17496141
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2025
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Rural-Urban Disparities in Family Planning Service Availability and Utilization Among Women in Bayelsa State
Dakolo, Ineye Becky, Israel Jeremiah
<div>This study investigated and compared the utilization of family planning (FP) services among women in rural and urban areas of Bayelsa State, Nigeria. Data collected from 422 respondents revealed significant disparities in FP use between the two settings. Overall, 51.2% of women had ever used FP services, with higher utilization among urban women (63.5%) than rural women (38.9%). Current FP use was also greater in urban areas (54.0%) compared to rural areas (30.3%). The leading reason for non-use was the desire for more children (21.8%), followed by fear of side effects (19.0%) and lack of access (18.2%). Oral contraceptives were the most commonly used method (40.4%), and 77.0% of users reported regular use. The main motivator for adoption was perceived health benefits to mothers (37.0%). The findings highlight a clear urban advantage in FP utilization, emphasizing the need for improved rural access, awareness, and health service delivery.</div> <div> </div>
title Rural-Urban Disparities in Family Planning Service Availability and Utilization Among Women in Bayelsa State
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17496141