CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY COMPARING EMERGENCY CHEST X-RAY INTERPRETATION BETWEEN EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS AND RADIOLOGISTS IN KSUMC

Fuente: Zenodo
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdulaziz, Al-Rabiah, Qusai, Al-Sulaiman, Ahmed Amer, Al-Boukai, Bandar, Al-Omar, Sohaib, Ashour, Muhammad Ahmed, Amer Al-Boukai, Abdulaziz, AlHokair
Format: Recurso digital
Language:English
Published: Zenodo 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866901188586242048
author Abdulaziz, Al-Rabiah
Qusai, Al-Sulaiman
Ahmed Amer, Al-Boukai
Bandar, Al-Omar
Sohaib, Ashour
Muhammad Ahmed, Amer Al-Boukai
Abdulaziz, AlHokair
author_facet Abdulaziz, Al-Rabiah
Qusai, Al-Sulaiman
Ahmed Amer, Al-Boukai
Bandar, Al-Omar
Sohaib, Ashour
Muhammad Ahmed, Amer Al-Boukai
Abdulaziz, AlHokair
contents <p>Background: X-ray imaging is a vital part of emergency diagnostics because of its speed, cost-effectiveness, and ability to provide critical information about a patient’s condition. This cross-sectional study assessed the competence of resident physicians in emergency and radiology departments in common emergency chest X-ray interpretation and compared the types of errors made by emergency physicians and radiologists. Background: X-ray imaging is a vital part of emergency diagnostics because of its speed, cost-effectiveness, and ability to provide critical information about a patient’s condition. This study assessed the competence of resident physicians in emergency and radiology departments in common emergency chest X-ray interpretation. In addition, it compared the types of errors made by emergency physicians and radiologists in common emergency chest X-ray interpretation Methods: This was a single-centre cross-sectional study conducted at King Khalid University Hospital among emergency and radiology physicians from July 2023 to March 2024. The data were collected through personal interviews with radiology and emergency department residents. A total of 54 radiology and emergency department residents were interviewed after being informed about the aim and methods of the study. Results: The results showed no significant differences in gender, age, residency level, occupation, or primary source of knowledge between radiology and emergency department residents. From the radiology department, 18 male residents (64.3%) and 10 female radiology residents (35.7%) were interviewed; from the emergency department, 14 male residents (53.8%) and 12 female residents (46.2%) were interviewed. In the radiology department, the primary source of knowledge was books (12 residents, 42.9%), followed by the internet (25%), experience (21.4%), and other sources (10.7%). Furthermore, the results showed no significant difference in the answers regarding tension pneumothorax X-rays between radiology and emergency residents. These findings suggest the need for improved communication and training between radiology and emergency departments to ensure the accurate and timely diagnosis and treatment of medical conditions. Conclusion: Although emergency and radiology residents have similar skills in interpreting chest X-rays, improved communication is needed between departments and specialized training programs. By prioritizing these areas, healthcare professionals can ensure more accurate and timely diagnoses, thus improving the quality of care provided to patients in emergency settings.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_17528977
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2025
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY COMPARING EMERGENCY CHEST X-RAY INTERPRETATION BETWEEN EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS AND RADIOLOGISTS IN KSUMC
Abdulaziz, Al-Rabiah
Qusai, Al-Sulaiman
Ahmed Amer, Al-Boukai
Bandar, Al-Omar
Sohaib, Ashour
Muhammad Ahmed, Amer Al-Boukai
Abdulaziz, AlHokair
X-ray interpretation, Radiology, Emergency department.
<p>Background: X-ray imaging is a vital part of emergency diagnostics because of its speed, cost-effectiveness, and ability to provide critical information about a patient’s condition. This cross-sectional study assessed the competence of resident physicians in emergency and radiology departments in common emergency chest X-ray interpretation and compared the types of errors made by emergency physicians and radiologists. Background: X-ray imaging is a vital part of emergency diagnostics because of its speed, cost-effectiveness, and ability to provide critical information about a patient’s condition. This study assessed the competence of resident physicians in emergency and radiology departments in common emergency chest X-ray interpretation. In addition, it compared the types of errors made by emergency physicians and radiologists in common emergency chest X-ray interpretation Methods: This was a single-centre cross-sectional study conducted at King Khalid University Hospital among emergency and radiology physicians from July 2023 to March 2024. The data were collected through personal interviews with radiology and emergency department residents. A total of 54 radiology and emergency department residents were interviewed after being informed about the aim and methods of the study. Results: The results showed no significant differences in gender, age, residency level, occupation, or primary source of knowledge between radiology and emergency department residents. From the radiology department, 18 male residents (64.3%) and 10 female radiology residents (35.7%) were interviewed; from the emergency department, 14 male residents (53.8%) and 12 female residents (46.2%) were interviewed. In the radiology department, the primary source of knowledge was books (12 residents, 42.9%), followed by the internet (25%), experience (21.4%), and other sources (10.7%). Furthermore, the results showed no significant difference in the answers regarding tension pneumothorax X-rays between radiology and emergency residents. These findings suggest the need for improved communication and training between radiology and emergency departments to ensure the accurate and timely diagnosis and treatment of medical conditions. Conclusion: Although emergency and radiology residents have similar skills in interpreting chest X-rays, improved communication is needed between departments and specialized training programs. By prioritizing these areas, healthcare professionals can ensure more accurate and timely diagnoses, thus improving the quality of care provided to patients in emergency settings.</p>
title CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY COMPARING EMERGENCY CHEST X-RAY INTERPRETATION BETWEEN EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS AND RADIOLOGISTS IN KSUMC
topic X-ray interpretation, Radiology, Emergency department.
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17528977