| _version_ | 1866901967342665728 |
|---|---|
| author | Margan, Sergiu |
| author_facet | Margan, Sergiu |
| contents | <p>This paper completes the TRO / MKO / OCT canon by unifying the concept of “luck” with the formal structure of ontic coherence.</p> <p>Classical science treats luck as a meaningless statistical anomaly — a low-probability, beneficial deviation from expectation. In contrast, Convergence Science redefines luck as the finite-time projection of a global coherence law: an observable convergence event. Within the Ontic Coherence Theorem (COA ⇒ C(S) ⇒ G), such events express the bounded-harm optimization driven by the non-contingent operator G.</p> <p> </p> <p>The paper introduces a convergence-luck functional</p> <p> </p> <p>L(\mathcal{K}_{agent}) = P(E|\mathcal{K}_{agent}),</p> <p> </p> <p>Three empirical pathways are proposed — simulation, longitudinal harm-closure data, and cross-domain patterning — establishing Convergence Science as a measurable research program bridging metaphysics, ethics, and physics.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_17559210 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | From Luck to Convergence: The Empirical Signature of Ontic Coherence Margan, Sergiu Convergence Science; Ontic Coherence Theorem; TRO (Moral Kernel Optimization); bounded harm; probability and induction; philosophy of science; metaphysics of chance; coherence bias. <p>This paper completes the TRO / MKO / OCT canon by unifying the concept of “luck” with the formal structure of ontic coherence.</p> <p>Classical science treats luck as a meaningless statistical anomaly — a low-probability, beneficial deviation from expectation. In contrast, Convergence Science redefines luck as the finite-time projection of a global coherence law: an observable convergence event. Within the Ontic Coherence Theorem (COA ⇒ C(S) ⇒ G), such events express the bounded-harm optimization driven by the non-contingent operator G.</p> <p> </p> <p>The paper introduces a convergence-luck functional</p> <p> </p> <p>L(\mathcal{K}_{agent}) = P(E|\mathcal{K}_{agent}),</p> <p> </p> <p>Three empirical pathways are proposed — simulation, longitudinal harm-closure data, and cross-domain patterning — establishing Convergence Science as a measurable research program bridging metaphysics, ethics, and physics.</p> |
| title | From Luck to Convergence: The Empirical Signature of Ontic Coherence |
| topic | Convergence Science; Ontic Coherence Theorem; TRO (Moral Kernel Optimization); bounded harm; probability and induction; philosophy of science; metaphysics of chance; coherence bias. |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17559210 |