Why Bell Tests Are a Dead End: The Case for Self-Synchronized Quantum Networks
Fuente:
Zenodo
Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso digital |
| Pubblicazione: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866901623940317184 |
|---|---|
| author | Elliott, G.H. |
| author_facet | Elliott, G.H. |
| contents | <p>Bell inequality tests have been the gold standard for demonstrating quantum nonlocality<br>for sixty years. We show they are fundamentally limited by their reliance on centralized<br>timing via coincidence windows. This architecture: (1) requires real-time correlation with<br>no offline processing capability, (2) scales poorly to multi-party systems requiring O(N*N)<br>timing circuits, (3) cannot exploit distributed quantum network topologies, and (4) discards<br>the phase information that enables self-synchronization. We demonstrate that homodyne<br>detection preserves embedded timing information in the form of phase, enabling post-hoc<br>correlation with 2140σ confidence without any coincidence circuitry. This amplitude-space<br>approach scales to arbitrary network complexity with O(1) timing requirements. Bell tests<br>served their historical purpose—proving quantum correlations exist—but their centralized<br>architecture makes them unsuitable as a foundation for scalable quantum networks. The<br>future of quantum information processing lies not in refining Bell tests, but in transcending<br>their architectural limitations.</p> <p>Keywords: quantum nonlocality, EPR paradox, Bell theorem, Born rule, bitemporal, dual time, system time, experimenter time, Schrödinger’s Clock, null time, coincidence window, coincidence-free Bell test, dimensional reduction, quantum foundations</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_17656922 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Why Bell Tests Are a Dead End: The Case for Self-Synchronized Quantum Networks Elliott, G.H. quantum nonlocality EPR paradox Bell theorem Born rule bitemporal dual time system time experimenter time null time coincidence window coincidence-free dimensional reduction quantum foundations. coincidence-free Bell test <p>Bell inequality tests have been the gold standard for demonstrating quantum nonlocality<br>for sixty years. We show they are fundamentally limited by their reliance on centralized<br>timing via coincidence windows. This architecture: (1) requires real-time correlation with<br>no offline processing capability, (2) scales poorly to multi-party systems requiring O(N*N)<br>timing circuits, (3) cannot exploit distributed quantum network topologies, and (4) discards<br>the phase information that enables self-synchronization. We demonstrate that homodyne<br>detection preserves embedded timing information in the form of phase, enabling post-hoc<br>correlation with 2140σ confidence without any coincidence circuitry. This amplitude-space<br>approach scales to arbitrary network complexity with O(1) timing requirements. Bell tests<br>served their historical purpose—proving quantum correlations exist—but their centralized<br>architecture makes them unsuitable as a foundation for scalable quantum networks. The<br>future of quantum information processing lies not in refining Bell tests, but in transcending<br>their architectural limitations.</p> <p>Keywords: quantum nonlocality, EPR paradox, Bell theorem, Born rule, bitemporal, dual time, system time, experimenter time, Schrödinger’s Clock, null time, coincidence window, coincidence-free Bell test, dimensional reduction, quantum foundations</p> |
| title | Why Bell Tests Are a Dead End: The Case for Self-Synchronized Quantum Networks |
| topic | quantum nonlocality EPR paradox Bell theorem Born rule bitemporal dual time system time experimenter time null time coincidence window coincidence-free dimensional reduction quantum foundations. coincidence-free Bell test |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17656922 |