Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17662046 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- <div>Here we pit <em><strong>Q</strong></em> <strong><em>—</em></strong> <em><strong>an</strong></em> <strong><em>atemporal</em></strong>, <strong><em>hypercomputational</em></strong>, <em><strong>omniscient,</strong></em><em><strong> omnipotent agent</strong></em> based upon the omnipotent entity of the same title from <em>Star Trek: The Next Generation</em> — against the <em><strong>Fixed-Point Paradox</strong></em> <em>(FPP)</em>.</div> <div> </div> <div>Every conceivable escape route for libertarian freedom — primitive haecceitistic choice, Everettian branching, oracle consultation, direct editing of the past — collapses into outright contradiction or principled unverifiability. The mechanism is mercilessly simple: infallible knowledge that the agent will do E (□ₖE) forces the metaphysical necessity of E (□ₘE), making counterfactual possibility (◇ₘ¬E) impossible.</div> <div> </div> <div>□ₖE ∧ ◇ₘ¬E ⊢ ⊥</div> <div> </div> <div>No hypercomputer, no non-computable primitive, no acausal intervention breaks the FPP. Probabilistic retreat only swaps incoherence for permanent epistemic darkness.</div> <div> </div> <div>Libertarian freedom is therefore not empirically elusive or metaphysically controversial. It is logically impossible.</div> <div> </div> <div>Hard determinism survives only as a trivial semantic variant of the same responsive structure. <em><strong>Only compatibilism remains both coherent and descriptively non-trivial.</strong></em></div> <div> </div> <div>Reality enforces an <em><strong>Axiomatic Opacity Constraint</strong></em>: genuine counterfactual openness is not merely unknown — it is unknowable in principle.</div> <div> </div> <div>Counterfactual freedom is not merely difficult to demonstrate; <strong><em>it's</em></strong> <em><strong>possible to </strong></em><strong><em>demonstrate that it is impossible to demonstrate it</em></strong>, and therefore belongs in the graveyard of failed theories, being epistemically-vacuous, scientifically unfalsifiable, morally questionable and logically impossible claims.</div> <div> </div> <div>For the complete eliminative argument including the history of the problem, detailed examination of the Fixed-Point Paradox, the Minimal Empirical Adequacy Conditions, the Hard Determinist Dilemma, and practical social and ethical applications, see the authors book entitled <strong><em>The Free Will Solution: A Formal Resolution to Two and a Half Millennia of Philosophical Struggle</em> (Golden Physics Project Press, 2025). Available via</strong> <a href="https://goldenphysics.org/publishing/the-free-will-solution.html"><strong>https://goldenphysics.org/publishing/the-free-will-solution.html</strong>.</a></div>