Directional Curl-Gradient Interferometry and General Relativity in the Aether Physics Model (QMU)
Fuente:
Zenodo
Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso digital |
| Lingua: | inglese |
| Pubblicazione: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866901478638092288 |
|---|---|
| author | Thomson, David |
| author_facet | Thomson, David |
| contents | <p>This research monograph revisits the foundations of relativistic gravitation and interferometry using the Aether Physics Model (APM) and its Quantum Measurement Units (QMU). The starting point is the long-standing misinterpretation of the Michelson--Morley experiment (MMX) as a "null" test of the Aether. A careful reading of MMX and subsequent ether-drift and rotation experiments shows that they falsify Michelson's rigid-Aether hypothesis but remain compatible with Lorentz's fluid-Aether model. In parallel, General Relativity (GR) successfully describes gravitational redshift, light bending, Shapiro time delay, and frame-dragging, but frames these phenomena in terms of curved spacetime rather than a structured medium.</p> <p>Within the APM/QMU framework, the Aether is modeled as a quantized rotating magnetic field substrate, characterized by the Aether unit $A_u$ and the torsional density unit $\mathrm{curl}$. Ledger identities such as the Aether rotational self-identity,<br>\[<br>A_u \,\mathrm{curl} = {F_q}^2 {\lambda_C}^2,<br>\]<br>provide a dimensional backbone that unifies electromagnetic and gravitational propagation. Einstein's circular deflection angle equation is rewritten as a QMU identity,<br>\[<br>\frac{G m}{r^2} = \mathrm{curl}^2(r)\,A_u,<br>\]<br>so that the gravitational field is seen as a curl-density gradient of the Aether. Gravitational redshift then appears as density dilation rather than time dilation: all clocks share a universal chronovibration $F_q$ and remain in a single present moment, while tick-rate differences arise from variations in Aether torsional density along their trajectories.</p> <p>The monograph systematically shows that the core empirical predictions of GR---including gravitational acceleration, redshift, light bending, Shapiro delay, and Lense--Thirring frame-dragging---are exactly reproducible in QMU as simple ledger identities involving $A_u$, $\mathrm{curl}$, $F_q$, and $\lambda_C$. A summary table maps standard GR expressions (e.g.\ $g = GM/r^2$, $\Delta f/f = \Delta\Phi/c^2$, $\alpha = 4GM/(c^2 b)$) to their APM/QMU counterparts (e.g.\ $g = \mathrm{curl}^2 A_u$, $\Delta f/f = \Delta\mathrm{curl}/\mathrm{curl}$), demonstrating that GR and APM are mathematically equivalent descriptions of the same physics, differing only in interpretation.</p> <p>Building on this equivalence, the work reanalyzes the geometry of MMX and related ether-drift experiments. The original MMX apparatus rotated entirely within a horizontal plane and was therefore structurally insensitive to the vertical curl gradient that encodes gravitational potential. To remedy this, the monograph develops a directional curl-gradient interferometer in which one arm remains horizontal on a constant-curl surface while the orthogonal arm is tilted vertically, climbing and descending through the curl gradient. The resulting phase shift $\Delta\phi(\theta)$ is derived in QMU and shown to be the exact interferometric analogue of gravitational redshift. A careful discussion distinguishes the first-order approximation from the full relativistic result, emphasizing that the net observable effect is second order in $L/r_0$ and fully consistent with modern optical and atom-interferometer measurements of the redshift gradient at the $\sim 10^{-16}\,\mathrm{m}^{-1}$ level.</p> <p>The monograph further proposes an elevator-borne implementation of curl-gradient interferometry, in which the entire apparatus is raised and lowered through a tall building while remaining level. This configuration probes the same gravitational potential gradient without relying on mechanical tilting of the arms, offering a clean, laboratory-scale realization of the GR/APM redshift effect. Modern optical-cavity and millimeter-scale atomic experiments are discussed as independent confirmations of the predicted potential gradient, providing an empirical anchor for the QMU formulation.</p> <p>Throughout, the Aether interpretation is presented not as a competing predictive theory but as a mathematically equivalent re-expression of General Relativity in a different variable set. Because the QMU ledger identities reproduce the Einstein field equations in a different basis, every empirical success of GR is automatically inherited by the APM representation. The distinction between ``curved spacetime'' and ``curl-density Aether'' lies only in interpretation. Seen in this light, the historical transition from Lorentz to Einstein was not the demise of the Aether but a change of language; the present analysis simply restores that language to a modern, quantum-consistent form and offers a concrete interferometric program for exploring it.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_17691395 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Directional Curl-Gradient Interferometry and General Relativity in the Aether Physics Model (QMU) Thomson, David QMU Aether Physics Model APM Aether curl chronovibration Michelson–Morley interferometry gravitational redshift light bending Shapiro delay frame-dragging Lense–Thirring General Relativity SWARM Lorentzian Aether foundations of relativity <p>This research monograph revisits the foundations of relativistic gravitation and interferometry using the Aether Physics Model (APM) and its Quantum Measurement Units (QMU). The starting point is the long-standing misinterpretation of the Michelson--Morley experiment (MMX) as a "null" test of the Aether. A careful reading of MMX and subsequent ether-drift and rotation experiments shows that they falsify Michelson's rigid-Aether hypothesis but remain compatible with Lorentz's fluid-Aether model. In parallel, General Relativity (GR) successfully describes gravitational redshift, light bending, Shapiro time delay, and frame-dragging, but frames these phenomena in terms of curved spacetime rather than a structured medium.</p> <p>Within the APM/QMU framework, the Aether is modeled as a quantized rotating magnetic field substrate, characterized by the Aether unit $A_u$ and the torsional density unit $\mathrm{curl}$. Ledger identities such as the Aether rotational self-identity,<br>\[<br>A_u \,\mathrm{curl} = {F_q}^2 {\lambda_C}^2,<br>\]<br>provide a dimensional backbone that unifies electromagnetic and gravitational propagation. Einstein's circular deflection angle equation is rewritten as a QMU identity,<br>\[<br>\frac{G m}{r^2} = \mathrm{curl}^2(r)\,A_u,<br>\]<br>so that the gravitational field is seen as a curl-density gradient of the Aether. Gravitational redshift then appears as density dilation rather than time dilation: all clocks share a universal chronovibration $F_q$ and remain in a single present moment, while tick-rate differences arise from variations in Aether torsional density along their trajectories.</p> <p>The monograph systematically shows that the core empirical predictions of GR---including gravitational acceleration, redshift, light bending, Shapiro delay, and Lense--Thirring frame-dragging---are exactly reproducible in QMU as simple ledger identities involving $A_u$, $\mathrm{curl}$, $F_q$, and $\lambda_C$. A summary table maps standard GR expressions (e.g.\ $g = GM/r^2$, $\Delta f/f = \Delta\Phi/c^2$, $\alpha = 4GM/(c^2 b)$) to their APM/QMU counterparts (e.g.\ $g = \mathrm{curl}^2 A_u$, $\Delta f/f = \Delta\mathrm{curl}/\mathrm{curl}$), demonstrating that GR and APM are mathematically equivalent descriptions of the same physics, differing only in interpretation.</p> <p>Building on this equivalence, the work reanalyzes the geometry of MMX and related ether-drift experiments. The original MMX apparatus rotated entirely within a horizontal plane and was therefore structurally insensitive to the vertical curl gradient that encodes gravitational potential. To remedy this, the monograph develops a directional curl-gradient interferometer in which one arm remains horizontal on a constant-curl surface while the orthogonal arm is tilted vertically, climbing and descending through the curl gradient. The resulting phase shift $\Delta\phi(\theta)$ is derived in QMU and shown to be the exact interferometric analogue of gravitational redshift. A careful discussion distinguishes the first-order approximation from the full relativistic result, emphasizing that the net observable effect is second order in $L/r_0$ and fully consistent with modern optical and atom-interferometer measurements of the redshift gradient at the $\sim 10^{-16}\,\mathrm{m}^{-1}$ level.</p> <p>The monograph further proposes an elevator-borne implementation of curl-gradient interferometry, in which the entire apparatus is raised and lowered through a tall building while remaining level. This configuration probes the same gravitational potential gradient without relying on mechanical tilting of the arms, offering a clean, laboratory-scale realization of the GR/APM redshift effect. Modern optical-cavity and millimeter-scale atomic experiments are discussed as independent confirmations of the predicted potential gradient, providing an empirical anchor for the QMU formulation.</p> <p>Throughout, the Aether interpretation is presented not as a competing predictive theory but as a mathematically equivalent re-expression of General Relativity in a different variable set. Because the QMU ledger identities reproduce the Einstein field equations in a different basis, every empirical success of GR is automatically inherited by the APM representation. The distinction between ``curved spacetime'' and ``curl-density Aether'' lies only in interpretation. Seen in this light, the historical transition from Lorentz to Einstein was not the demise of the Aether but a change of language; the present analysis simply restores that language to a modern, quantum-consistent form and offers a concrete interferometric program for exploring it.</p> |
| title | Directional Curl-Gradient Interferometry and General Relativity in the Aether Physics Model (QMU) |
| topic | QMU Aether Physics Model APM Aether curl chronovibration Michelson–Morley interferometry gravitational redshift light bending Shapiro delay frame-dragging Lense–Thirring General Relativity SWARM Lorentzian Aether foundations of relativity |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17691395 |