| _version_ | 1866901577195847680 |
|---|---|
| author | Delmazo, Carol |
| author_facet | Delmazo, Carol |
| contents | <p>The GraspOS Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) pilot, led by OPERAS Research Infrastructure, offers a case study of scientific domain reform through co-creation. It gathered essential data, articulated domain-specific requirements, and acted as a living laboratory for testing the GraspOS Federated Open Infrastructure and the SCOPE+i Framework. This presentation traces the pilot's journey. Guided by the SCOPE Framework's principle “Evaluate with the evaluated,” the SSH Pilot used a Community of Practice and a series of workshops to involve the community in identifying what outputs, activities, and processes should be valued in research assessment. This co-creation process also included a collaborative evaluation of a Narrative CV template tailored to SSH. Finally, the guidance and recommendations resulting from the SSH Pilot were also validated by the community in a final workshop. This approach gave the SSH community a real voice and contributed to reinforcing a sense of ownership.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_17692913 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Community voices in research assessment: insights from the SSH Pilot Delmazo, Carol Social Sciences Humanities Humanities Research Assessment Responsible Research Assessment SCOPE Framework <p>The GraspOS Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) pilot, led by OPERAS Research Infrastructure, offers a case study of scientific domain reform through co-creation. It gathered essential data, articulated domain-specific requirements, and acted as a living laboratory for testing the GraspOS Federated Open Infrastructure and the SCOPE+i Framework. This presentation traces the pilot's journey. Guided by the SCOPE Framework's principle “Evaluate with the evaluated,” the SSH Pilot used a Community of Practice and a series of workshops to involve the community in identifying what outputs, activities, and processes should be valued in research assessment. This co-creation process also included a collaborative evaluation of a Narrative CV template tailored to SSH. Finally, the guidance and recommendations resulting from the SSH Pilot were also validated by the community in a final workshop. This approach gave the SSH community a real voice and contributed to reinforcing a sense of ownership.</p> |
| title | Community voices in research assessment: insights from the SSH Pilot |
| topic | Social Sciences Humanities Humanities Research Assessment Responsible Research Assessment SCOPE Framework |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17692913 |