Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: NEWAZ, M. N.
Format: Recurso digital
Language:
Published: Zenodo 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17729496
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Table of Contents:
  • <p><b>Table 1 - Performance ł Characteristics of FGDs</b> <b>Type of Characteristics Plant</b> FGD Capital Cost Increase</p><table><thead><tr><th>Wet FGD</th><th><b>•</b> Flue gas is saturated with water</th><th>11-14%</th></tr><tr><th colspan="3"><b>•</b> Limestone (CaCO3) as reagent</th></tr><tr><th colspan="3"><b>•</b> Removal efficiency up to 98%</th></tr><tr><th colspan="3"><b>•</b> Use 1-1.5% of electricity generated</th></tr><tr><th colspan="3"><b>•</b> Most widely used</th></tr><tr><th colspan="3"><b>•</b> Distance to limestone source and</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th></th><td>the limestone reactivity to be</td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td>considered</td><td></td></tr><tr><th colspan="3"><b>•</b> High water consumption</th></tr><tr><th colspan="3"><b>•</b> Need to treat wastewater</th></tr><tr><th colspan="3"><b>•</b> Gypsum as a saleable by-product</th></tr><tr><th></th><td>or waste</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Semi-Dry</th><td><b>•</b> Also called “Dry Scrubbing” –</td><td>9-12%</td></tr><tr><th><b>FGD</b></th><td>under controlled humidification.</td><td></td></tr><tr><th colspan="3"><b>•</b> Lime (CaO) as reagent</th></tr><tr><th colspan="3"><b>•</b> Removal efficiency up to 94%</th></tr></tbody></table>