Contextual and Global Falsification of Scientific Models: An Integrated Theory of Epistemic Validity

Fuente: Zenodo
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Rapp, Stefan
Formato: Recurso digital
Lenguaje:inglés
Publicado: Zenodo 2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866901826507374592
author Rapp, Stefan
author_facet Rapp, Stefan
contents <p>This paper develops an integrated theory of the epistemic validity of scientific models by unifying central insights from Popper, Kuhn, Lakatos, model theory, and contemporary approaches to approximate truth. The framework introduces a two-level structure of falsification that distinguishes contextual from global model failure, formalizes approximate truth as a domain-specific similarity metric, and embeds model evaluation into an explicit utility function combining approximate truth, explanatory power, and model costs. A further contribution is the concept of the epistemic opportunity space E(t), which specifies the methodological, technical, and institutional conditions under which models can be formulated, evaluated, and stabilized.<br>The theory reconstructs model practice in modern simulation-based sciences and is illustrated using climate-model ensembles. It provides a unified structure for understanding why models persist despite partial falsifications and under which conditions global elimination becomes epistemically justified.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_17746995
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2025
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Contextual and Global Falsification of Scientific Models: An Integrated Theory of Epistemic Validity
Rapp, Stefan
alsification model evaluation philosophy of science approximate truth epistemic opportunity space model selection scientific realism Lakatos Popper Kuhn utility function domain structure climate models epistemic rationality
<p>This paper develops an integrated theory of the epistemic validity of scientific models by unifying central insights from Popper, Kuhn, Lakatos, model theory, and contemporary approaches to approximate truth. The framework introduces a two-level structure of falsification that distinguishes contextual from global model failure, formalizes approximate truth as a domain-specific similarity metric, and embeds model evaluation into an explicit utility function combining approximate truth, explanatory power, and model costs. A further contribution is the concept of the epistemic opportunity space E(t), which specifies the methodological, technical, and institutional conditions under which models can be formulated, evaluated, and stabilized.<br>The theory reconstructs model practice in modern simulation-based sciences and is illustrated using climate-model ensembles. It provides a unified structure for understanding why models persist despite partial falsifications and under which conditions global elimination becomes epistemically justified.</p>
title Contextual and Global Falsification of Scientific Models: An Integrated Theory of Epistemic Validity
topic alsification model evaluation philosophy of science approximate truth epistemic opportunity space model selection scientific realism Lakatos Popper Kuhn utility function domain structure climate models epistemic rationality
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17746995