Polyfactoriality as a Defining Criterion of Formulaic Speech

Fuente: Zenodo
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Schmale, Günter
Formato: Recurso digital
Lenguaje:inglés
Publicado: Zenodo 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866901862182027264
author Schmale, Günter
author_facet Schmale, Günter
contents <p><strong><a href="https://www.journaloflinguisticsandlanguageteaching.com/">Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching (JLLT)</a></strong></p> <p>Starting from the observation that the criteria generally applied to the definition of formulaic speech—polylexicality, (relative) stability, and idiomaticity—no longer reflect the current state-of-the-art insights into the nature of prefabricated speech production and comprehension, the present paper proposes a revised vision of formulaicity that takes the pivotal defining criterion of polyfactoriality as its basis. This notion makes it possible to take into account segmental, prosodic, corporal, contextual, and situational elements when defining an utterance, or one of its units, as formulaic, even when it consists of only a single lexical item. It also permits a considerable extension of the scope of formulaic communicative manifestations, ranging from monolexical routine formulae and sentence-based proverbs to formulaic texts and even communicative events. As a hyperonym, polyfactoriality is likewise characterized by relative stability through its smallest common formulaic denominator, by semantic non-compositionality (arising from its idiomatic footprint), and by its multimodal character. Based on these reflections, a revised definition of the notion of a formulaic sequence will be put forward.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_17753244
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2010
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Polyfactoriality as a Defining Criterion of Formulaic Speech
Schmale, Günter
Linguistics
<p><strong><a href="https://www.journaloflinguisticsandlanguageteaching.com/">Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching (JLLT)</a></strong></p> <p>Starting from the observation that the criteria generally applied to the definition of formulaic speech—polylexicality, (relative) stability, and idiomaticity—no longer reflect the current state-of-the-art insights into the nature of prefabricated speech production and comprehension, the present paper proposes a revised vision of formulaicity that takes the pivotal defining criterion of polyfactoriality as its basis. This notion makes it possible to take into account segmental, prosodic, corporal, contextual, and situational elements when defining an utterance, or one of its units, as formulaic, even when it consists of only a single lexical item. It also permits a considerable extension of the scope of formulaic communicative manifestations, ranging from monolexical routine formulae and sentence-based proverbs to formulaic texts and even communicative events. As a hyperonym, polyfactoriality is likewise characterized by relative stability through its smallest common formulaic denominator, by semantic non-compositionality (arising from its idiomatic footprint), and by its multimodal character. Based on these reflections, a revised definition of the notion of a formulaic sequence will be put forward.</p>
title Polyfactoriality as a Defining Criterion of Formulaic Speech
topic Linguistics
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17753244