Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17790103 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- This paper explores the profound impact of the Iconoclastic Controversy (726-843 CE) on the formation of the visual ideology during the subsequent Macedonian Renaissance (867-1056 CE) in the Byzantine Empire. The period following the definitive triumph of Orthodoxy represented a "crucible" where theological principles, imperial propaganda, and artistic expression coalesced into a distinctive and enduring visual language. We argue that the destruction and re-evaluation inherent in the Iconoclastic period did not merely lead to a restoration of figural imagery, but rather catalyzed a systematic and ideologically charged redefinition of how sacred art functioned within Byzantine society and statecraft. This redefinition involved a conscious synthesis of classical aesthetics with Christian dogma, the reassertion of imperial authority through carefully curated religious narratives, and the establishment of iconographic programs that visually articulated the triumph of Orthodoxy. By analyzing key artistic monuments, theological treatises, and imperial patronage patterns, this study elucidates how the traumatic experience of Iconoclasm ultimately refined and solidified the visual foundations of Byzantine identity, laying the groundwork for its subsequent artistic florescence.