Assessing the suitability of non-crop plant species for guideline testing

Fuente: Zenodo
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Isemer, Rena, Fellmann, Sebastian, Elischer, Anne, Koehler, Petra, Mihan, Christine, Jans, Daniela, Ducrot, Virginie
Format: Recurso digital
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Zenodo 2021
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866901677049643008
author Isemer, Rena
Fellmann, Sebastian
Elischer, Anne
Koehler, Petra
Mihan, Christine
Jans, Daniela
Ducrot, Virginie
author_facet Isemer, Rena
Fellmann, Sebastian
Elischer, Anne
Koehler, Petra
Mihan, Christine
Jans, Daniela
Ducrot, Virginie
contents <div> <p>Guideline testing typically favors crop species because they reliably meet validity criteria (≥70% germination, ≥90% survival, and uniform growth), ensuring statistically robust results. However, questions remain about whether non-crop species are adequately represented in current PPP risk assessments.</p> <p>This work identifies non-crop species from diverse plant families—other than commonly used crops—that are likely to occur near agricultural fields in Germany, are not target species, and can meet guideline validity criteria. Several species fulfilling these requirements were found, but practical challenges persist, including:</p> <ul> <li>Limited seed availability and variable quality among suppliers</li> <li>Species-specific sowing depth requirements</li> <li>Need for excess sowing to achieve uniform stands</li> <li>Reproducibility of results requiring further confirmation</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p>A presentation and a poster are shared that both show results from this work. </p> </div>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_17832127
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2021
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Assessing the suitability of non-crop plant species for guideline testing
Isemer, Rena
Fellmann, Sebastian
Elischer, Anne
Koehler, Petra
Mihan, Christine
Jans, Daniela
Ducrot, Virginie
non-target terrestrial plants
ecotoxicology
effect testing
OECD 208
OECD 227
risk assessment
wild species
<div> <p>Guideline testing typically favors crop species because they reliably meet validity criteria (≥70% germination, ≥90% survival, and uniform growth), ensuring statistically robust results. However, questions remain about whether non-crop species are adequately represented in current PPP risk assessments.</p> <p>This work identifies non-crop species from diverse plant families—other than commonly used crops—that are likely to occur near agricultural fields in Germany, are not target species, and can meet guideline validity criteria. Several species fulfilling these requirements were found, but practical challenges persist, including:</p> <ul> <li>Limited seed availability and variable quality among suppliers</li> <li>Species-specific sowing depth requirements</li> <li>Need for excess sowing to achieve uniform stands</li> <li>Reproducibility of results requiring further confirmation</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p>A presentation and a poster are shared that both show results from this work. </p> </div>
title Assessing the suitability of non-crop plant species for guideline testing
topic non-target terrestrial plants
ecotoxicology
effect testing
OECD 208
OECD 227
risk assessment
wild species
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17832127