The Svalbard Crucible: Testing Treaty Diplomacy Against Northern Sea Route Statecraft in a Warming Arctic
Fuente:
Zenodo
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Recurso digital |
| Publicado: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866901241259360256 |
|---|---|
| author | Revista, Zen GEOGRAPHY, 10 |
| author_facet | Revista, Zen GEOGRAPHY, 10 |
| contents | The rapid environmental transformation of the Arctic, particularly the accelerated melting of sea ice, has profound geopolitical implications, chief among them the increasing navigability and strategic importance of the Northern Sea Route (NSR). This paper explores the complex interplay between the established international legal regime governing the Svalbard archipelago, enshrined in the 1920 Svalbard Treaty, and the evolving statecraft and assertive claims surrounding the Northern Sea Route, predominantly by the Russian Federation. Svalbard, a territory under Norwegian sovereignty but with unique non-discriminatory economic rights for all signatory states, presents a fascinating crucible where principles of treaty diplomacy and shared access are tested against emerging notions of sovereign control over vital Arctic shipping lanes. The paper analyzes how a warming Arctic accentuates these tensions, examining the legal interpretations, historical contexts, and contemporary geopolitical strategies employed by various actors. It posits that the divergent legal philosophies and strategic imperatives concerning Svalbard and the NSR generate significant challenges for regional stability and the future of Arctic governance, necessitating a delicate balance between national interests, international law, and environmental stewardship. The findings reveal a significant divergence in approaches, where the cooperative framework of the Svalbard Treaty faces increasing pressure from a more unilateralist approach to the management of trans-Arctic shipping. |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_17838726 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | The Svalbard Crucible: Testing Treaty Diplomacy Against Northern Sea Route Statecraft in a Warming Arctic Revista, Zen GEOGRAPHY, 10 The rapid environmental transformation of the Arctic, particularly the accelerated melting of sea ice, has profound geopolitical implications, chief among them the increasing navigability and strategic importance of the Northern Sea Route (NSR). This paper explores the complex interplay between the established international legal regime governing the Svalbard archipelago, enshrined in the 1920 Svalbard Treaty, and the evolving statecraft and assertive claims surrounding the Northern Sea Route, predominantly by the Russian Federation. Svalbard, a territory under Norwegian sovereignty but with unique non-discriminatory economic rights for all signatory states, presents a fascinating crucible where principles of treaty diplomacy and shared access are tested against emerging notions of sovereign control over vital Arctic shipping lanes. The paper analyzes how a warming Arctic accentuates these tensions, examining the legal interpretations, historical contexts, and contemporary geopolitical strategies employed by various actors. It posits that the divergent legal philosophies and strategic imperatives concerning Svalbard and the NSR generate significant challenges for regional stability and the future of Arctic governance, necessitating a delicate balance between national interests, international law, and environmental stewardship. The findings reveal a significant divergence in approaches, where the cooperative framework of the Svalbard Treaty faces increasing pressure from a more unilateralist approach to the management of trans-Arctic shipping. |
| title | The Svalbard Crucible: Testing Treaty Diplomacy Against Northern Sea Route Statecraft in a Warming Arctic |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17838726 |