Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Recurso digital |
| Lenguaje: | |
| Publicado: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Acceso en línea: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17848298 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866901685403648000 |
|---|---|
| author | Six, Sam |
| author_facet | Six, Sam |
| contents | <p>This paper re-examines several long-standing conceptual paradoxes in fundamental physics—such as the invariance of the speed of light, quantum nonlocality, gauge redundancy, black hole information loss, and gravitational singularities—through a minimal layered ontology derived from the Six-Field architecture. Using only two structural ingredients of the ontology—a substrate-level propagation constraint <span><span>cc</span><span><span><span>c</span></span></span></span> and a hierarchy of emergent layers—the paper demonstrates that these paradoxes arise primarily from mixing phenomena that belong to different conceptual layers (global resonance structure, internal ordering, emergent geometry, and effective physics). When each phenomenon is placed in its correct layer, the apparent contradictions dissolve naturally: entanglement resides at the global-state layer and never conflicts with geometric locality; gauge symmetry originates from internal representation freedom rather than geometry; horizons can hide information at the geometric layer without affecting the global substrate state; and singularities correspond to breakdowns of the geometric approximation, not physical infinities.</p> <p>The analysis strengthens the internal coherence of the broader Six-Field program, aligning with earlier work on the substrate operator, proto-mathematical structure, and gauge emergence, all of which independently predict the same layer distinctions used here. Rather than introducing new assumptions, the paper shows that a simple, minimal layer separation resolves diverse paradoxes across quantum theory and general relativity, indicating that the Six-Field ontology has reached the stage of a structurally consistent and unifying conceptual framework.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_17848298 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Six-Field - Paradox Eploration Six, Sam <p>This paper re-examines several long-standing conceptual paradoxes in fundamental physics—such as the invariance of the speed of light, quantum nonlocality, gauge redundancy, black hole information loss, and gravitational singularities—through a minimal layered ontology derived from the Six-Field architecture. Using only two structural ingredients of the ontology—a substrate-level propagation constraint <span><span>cc</span><span><span><span>c</span></span></span></span> and a hierarchy of emergent layers—the paper demonstrates that these paradoxes arise primarily from mixing phenomena that belong to different conceptual layers (global resonance structure, internal ordering, emergent geometry, and effective physics). When each phenomenon is placed in its correct layer, the apparent contradictions dissolve naturally: entanglement resides at the global-state layer and never conflicts with geometric locality; gauge symmetry originates from internal representation freedom rather than geometry; horizons can hide information at the geometric layer without affecting the global substrate state; and singularities correspond to breakdowns of the geometric approximation, not physical infinities.</p> <p>The analysis strengthens the internal coherence of the broader Six-Field program, aligning with earlier work on the substrate operator, proto-mathematical structure, and gauge emergence, all of which independently predict the same layer distinctions used here. Rather than introducing new assumptions, the paper shows that a simple, minimal layer separation resolves diverse paradoxes across quantum theory and general relativity, indicating that the Six-Field ontology has reached the stage of a structurally consistent and unifying conceptual framework.</p> |
| title | Six-Field - Paradox Eploration |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17848298 |