The Wittenberg Framework (Part I): A Three-Axis Model for Cross-Cultural AI Governance
Fuente:
Zenodo
Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso digital |
| Lingua: | inglese |
| Pubblicazione: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866902083571023872 |
|---|---|
| author | Wittenberg, Ingo |
| author_facet | Wittenberg, Ingo |
| contents | <p>This preprint introduces a unified three-axis framework for analysing AI governance across cultural traditions and regulatory environments. Integrating Augustine’s concept of moral order, Confucian relational ethics, and cross-continental regulatory orientations, the framework provides a structured approach to understanding how AI reshapes moral priorities, social hierarchy, and institutional authority.</p> <p>Version 1.2 includes a refined definition of “irrationality loops”—cross-domain feedback cycles in which distortions on one axis propagate into moral, relational, or institutional misalignments. These loops capture systemic governance instabilities emerging in AI-mediated environments.</p> <p>The framework is intended as a conceptual tool for diagnosing alignment challenges, relational disruptions, and regulatory contradictions, supporting well-being-oriented oversight, platform governance, and high-impact AI assessment.</p> <p>Version 2: Minor updates</p> <p>Version 3: This update adds two clarifying sentences—one in the Introduction and one in the Conclusion—to explicitly indicate that the full formalisation and taxonomic development of the axes is completed in later parts of the series. The References section has been refined for consistency (removal of policy-specific references and alignment with standard bibliographic formats). No changes were made to the conceptual structure, analytical logic, or argumentative trajectory of Part I.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_17848501 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | The Wittenberg Framework (Part I): A Three-Axis Model for Cross-Cultural AI Governance Wittenberg, Ingo AI Governance cross-cultural regulation moral order Confucian ethics regulatory models irrationality loops platform governance <p>This preprint introduces a unified three-axis framework for analysing AI governance across cultural traditions and regulatory environments. Integrating Augustine’s concept of moral order, Confucian relational ethics, and cross-continental regulatory orientations, the framework provides a structured approach to understanding how AI reshapes moral priorities, social hierarchy, and institutional authority.</p> <p>Version 1.2 includes a refined definition of “irrationality loops”—cross-domain feedback cycles in which distortions on one axis propagate into moral, relational, or institutional misalignments. These loops capture systemic governance instabilities emerging in AI-mediated environments.</p> <p>The framework is intended as a conceptual tool for diagnosing alignment challenges, relational disruptions, and regulatory contradictions, supporting well-being-oriented oversight, platform governance, and high-impact AI assessment.</p> <p>Version 2: Minor updates</p> <p>Version 3: This update adds two clarifying sentences—one in the Introduction and one in the Conclusion—to explicitly indicate that the full formalisation and taxonomic development of the axes is completed in later parts of the series. The References section has been refined for consistency (removal of policy-specific references and alignment with standard bibliographic formats). No changes were made to the conceptual structure, analytical logic, or argumentative trajectory of Part I.</p> |
| title | The Wittenberg Framework (Part I): A Three-Axis Model for Cross-Cultural AI Governance |
| topic | AI Governance cross-cultural regulation moral order Confucian ethics regulatory models irrationality loops platform governance |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17848501 |