Technocratic Sovereignty 2.1 Architecture, Crisis, and the Transformation of Modern State Power
Fuente:
Zenodo
Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso digital |
| Lingua: | inglese |
| Pubblicazione: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866901337299484672 |
|---|---|
| author | Garscha, Matthias |
| author_facet | Garscha, Matthias |
| contents | <p dir="ltr"><span>Technocratic Sovereignty 2.1</span><span> presents a refined meta-theoretical update to the original TS framework, arguing that modern sovereignty operates through financial, legal, digital, and administrative infrastructures rather than formal institutions. The update introduces a three-mode model of sovereign capacity (dual, continuous, fragmented), links TS to Sovereign Liquidity (SL) and Constitutional Liquidity Power (CLP), and prepares the ground for empirical extensions through the forthcoming ICL Index and the China case study.</span></p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_17896645 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Technocratic Sovereignty 2.1 Architecture, Crisis, and the Transformation of Modern State Power Garscha, Matthias infrastructural power; global liquidity; technocratic sovereignty; crisis governance; constitutional liquidity; global hierarchy financial architectures; comparative political economy; <p dir="ltr"><span>Technocratic Sovereignty 2.1</span><span> presents a refined meta-theoretical update to the original TS framework, arguing that modern sovereignty operates through financial, legal, digital, and administrative infrastructures rather than formal institutions. The update introduces a three-mode model of sovereign capacity (dual, continuous, fragmented), links TS to Sovereign Liquidity (SL) and Constitutional Liquidity Power (CLP), and prepares the ground for empirical extensions through the forthcoming ICL Index and the China case study.</span></p> |
| title | Technocratic Sovereignty 2.1 Architecture, Crisis, and the Transformation of Modern State Power |
| topic | infrastructural power; global liquidity; technocratic sovereignty; crisis governance; constitutional liquidity; global hierarchy financial architectures; comparative political economy; |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17896645 |