Extraterritorial Sanctions and Judicial Accountability: The Complete Cycle of the Alexandre de Moraes Case - From Unprecedented Designation to Unprecedented Delisting (July-December 2025)
Fuente:
Zenodo
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | En |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866901663731679232 |
|---|---|
| author | Marinho, Wederson |
| author_facet | Marinho, Wederson |
| contents | <p>This study analyzes the unprecedented complete lifecycle of American extraterritorial sanctions applied against Brazilian Supreme Federal Court (STF) Justice Alexandre de Moraes under the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act. Building upon the author's initial real-time analysis of the designation on July 30, 2025, this working paper examines the equally unprecedented silent delisting after exactly 135 days, without official explanation or press release from the U.S. Treasury Department.</p> <p>The original designation, confirmed by OFAC Press Release SB0211, was based on allegations of "arbitrary pre-trial detentions and suppression of freedom of expression," marking the first application of Global Magnitsky sanctions against a Latin American supreme court justice and the first against a sitting magistrate of a consolidated democracy. On December 12, 2025, all designations were removed from the Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) list in an administrative update, with no accompanying justification.</p> <p>Through rigorous comparative analysis of Global Magnitsky delisting precedents since 2012, this research reveals that the 135-day sanctions duration represents the fastest complete reversal in program history for human rights violations allegations. The study examines three competing hypotheses: (1) diplomatic negotiation under commercial pressure, (2) technical-legal unsustainability of allegations, and (3) geopolitical recalibration by the Trump administration.</p> <p>The research confirms systemic vulnerabilities in the Global Magnitsky sanctions architecture, demonstrating political selectivity, susceptibility to bilateral pressure, and erosion of institutional credibility through inconsistent application. The case establishes precedent for future delisting strategies and exposes double standards in enforcement between strategic adversaries and commercial partners.</p> <p>This work contributes to international law scholarship on extraterritorial jurisdiction limits, judicial independence boundaries in democratic systems, and emerging accountability mechanisms' effectiveness. It provides the first comprehensive academic analysis of both the designation and delisting phases of this landmark case.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_17918226 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | enc |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Extraterritorial Sanctions and Judicial Accountability: The Complete Cycle of the Alexandre de Moraes Case - From Unprecedented Designation to Unprecedented Delisting (July-December 2025) Marinho, Wederson Global Magnitsky Act extraterritorial sanctions judicial accountability human rights separation of powers OFAC sanctions delisting Brazil United States international law Supreme Federal Court Brazil-US relations <p>This study analyzes the unprecedented complete lifecycle of American extraterritorial sanctions applied against Brazilian Supreme Federal Court (STF) Justice Alexandre de Moraes under the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act. Building upon the author's initial real-time analysis of the designation on July 30, 2025, this working paper examines the equally unprecedented silent delisting after exactly 135 days, without official explanation or press release from the U.S. Treasury Department.</p> <p>The original designation, confirmed by OFAC Press Release SB0211, was based on allegations of "arbitrary pre-trial detentions and suppression of freedom of expression," marking the first application of Global Magnitsky sanctions against a Latin American supreme court justice and the first against a sitting magistrate of a consolidated democracy. On December 12, 2025, all designations were removed from the Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) list in an administrative update, with no accompanying justification.</p> <p>Through rigorous comparative analysis of Global Magnitsky delisting precedents since 2012, this research reveals that the 135-day sanctions duration represents the fastest complete reversal in program history for human rights violations allegations. The study examines three competing hypotheses: (1) diplomatic negotiation under commercial pressure, (2) technical-legal unsustainability of allegations, and (3) geopolitical recalibration by the Trump administration.</p> <p>The research confirms systemic vulnerabilities in the Global Magnitsky sanctions architecture, demonstrating political selectivity, susceptibility to bilateral pressure, and erosion of institutional credibility through inconsistent application. The case establishes precedent for future delisting strategies and exposes double standards in enforcement between strategic adversaries and commercial partners.</p> <p>This work contributes to international law scholarship on extraterritorial jurisdiction limits, judicial independence boundaries in democratic systems, and emerging accountability mechanisms' effectiveness. It provides the first comprehensive academic analysis of both the designation and delisting phases of this landmark case.</p> |
| title | Extraterritorial Sanctions and Judicial Accountability: The Complete Cycle of the Alexandre de Moraes Case - From Unprecedented Designation to Unprecedented Delisting (July-December 2025) |
| topic | Global Magnitsky Act extraterritorial sanctions judicial accountability human rights separation of powers OFAC sanctions delisting Brazil United States international law Supreme Federal Court Brazil-US relations |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17918226 |