Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Langue: | |
| Publié: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Accès en ligne: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17933056 |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Table des matières:
- <p>FREEDOM OS (FOS) is a Constitutional Integrity Protocol: a structural, mathematical framework for Applied AI Governance, Safety, Reliability, and Interpretability. It treats safety as a non-negotiable invariant and converts governance from human interpretation into computational enforcement.</p> <p> </p> <p>This upload provides a portfolio case study showing an end-to-end governance stack that translates axioms into deployable infrastructure artifacts, including:</p> <p> </p> <ul> <li>a Baseline Safety Manifest that locks a certified safety floor (S_{\max}) and prevents silent regression,</li> <li>a Core Model Safety Manifest that evaluates capability change (\Delta C) alongside safety change (\Delta S) under Safety-Preserving Innovation (\mathcal{I}_{SPI}),</li> <li>a CI/CD Release Gate and validator stub that automatically blocks deployment when non-regression or innovation constraints are violated, and</li> <li>a machine-readable verdict format designed for auditability and traceability (\mathcal{M}_{MAC}).</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p>Core claims:</p> <p> </p> <ol> <li>Safety can be enforced as infrastructure (schemas + gates), not policy alone.</li> <li>Non-regression is provable and auditable across releases.</li> <li>Innovation is permitted, but capability gains must not introduce safety decline.</li> </ol> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p>This artifact is intended for AI safety/governance reviewers, platform and reliability engineers, and hiring panels evaluating systems thinking and release-control design.</p>