Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17935301 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- <p>Ancient megastructures such as the Egyptian pyramids, Stonehenge, Carnac, Atlantic European dolmens, and trilithons did not arise randomly and were not constructed during periods of crisis. This study argues that these structures systematically emerged during phases of climatic and economic optimum, when stable environmental conditions, high agricultural productivity, and surplus resources enabled societies to undertake large-scale engineering projects.</p> <p> </p> <p>The analysis integrates climatic chronology, archaeological context, engineering logic, and human behavioral patterns. It demonstrates that the peak of megalithic construction across Egypt, Britain, Atlantic Europe, and the Mediterranean coincides with the interval of approximately 3500–2600 BCE, while the decline of these traditions aligns with the 4.2 ka climatic event and subsequent systemic instability. Stonehenge and the Egyptian pyramids are interpreted as phenomena of the same structural order: elite-driven megaprojects rooted in surplus economies, transport networks, and optimized construction technologies rather than myth or miracle.</p> <p> </p> <p>Special attention is given to practical engineering solutions — water-based transport, canals, sledges, rollers, animal traction, natural measurement systems, and inherited construction experience from earlier monumental forms such as mastabas. Symbolism is treated as a secondary layer emerging from economic power and environmental dependence, with architecture reproducing dominant natural forms such as the Sun, sacred mountains, and elevated terrain.</p>