The Hubble Tension as Witness-Dependent Metric Stiffness in the Genesis Framework
Fuente:
Zenodo
Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Langue: | anglais |
| Publié: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1866902335969558528 |
|---|---|
| author | Buyanovskiy, Georgiy |
| author_facet | Buyanovskiy, Georgiy |
| contents | <p>The “Hubble tension” is the persistent mismatch between early-Universe inferences of the present-day expansion rate and late-Universe determinations, often quoted at the ≳ 5σ level for the canonical Planck base-ΛCDM versus SH0ES Cepheid–SN Ia comparison [6, 7, 5]. Standard cosmology interprets this mismatch as either (i) unaccounted systematic error, or (ii) evidence for physics beyond ΛCDM. In the Genesis framework, spacetime geometry is not taken as primitive: it is an emergent structure produced by the Axiomatic Observer through record-consistent transitions supported by a physical witness network [1]. In Genesis, the “past” is not an ontic location that requires anthropomorphic “witnesses”; “early” and “late” cosmology denote different record sectors Ri ⊂ At inside the Observer’s present axiomatic basis. Accordingly, we treat “witness density” operationally as redundancy and complexity of classical records, not as the presence of observers. Consequently, a reported value of H0 is inherently protocol-defined. The prime purpose of this article is therefore not to propose yet another cosmological “fix,” but to craft an experimentally grounded observational program that can confirm or refute Genesis using existing and near-term datasets. We introduce a minimal phenomenology in which each cosmological probe samples an effective metric stiffness s(ρW ) that depends on a coarsegrained witness density ρW (redundancy of classical records). This recasts the Hubble tension as a structured, falsifiable prediction: protocols that couple to higher witness density should infer systematically larger stiffness, and hence larger effective H0. We then derive a prioritized set of falsification protocols, including witness/complexity-stratified distance-ladder reanalysis in shared host sets, JWST same-host multi-indicator extensions, and global hierarchical fits across CMB/BAO/SNe/time-delays/megamasers/standard sirens, emphasizing low-cost reanalysis opportunities and high-leverage JWST/HST program extensions. Part I summarizes the observational status of the Hubble tension and the relevant measurement pipelines. Part II translates the tension into Genesis language, defining witness density, metric stiffness, and protocol-defined H0. Part III introduces a minimal two-sector (Silent/Manifest) mixture model and a continuous “running” generalization, unifying the treatment with the Genesis fine-structure constant framework. Part IV derives concrete falsification protocols, prioritized by discriminating power per observational dollar.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_17985663 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | The Hubble Tension as Witness-Dependent Metric Stiffness in the Genesis Framework Buyanovskiy, Georgiy Hubble tension <p>The “Hubble tension” is the persistent mismatch between early-Universe inferences of the present-day expansion rate and late-Universe determinations, often quoted at the ≳ 5σ level for the canonical Planck base-ΛCDM versus SH0ES Cepheid–SN Ia comparison [6, 7, 5]. Standard cosmology interprets this mismatch as either (i) unaccounted systematic error, or (ii) evidence for physics beyond ΛCDM. In the Genesis framework, spacetime geometry is not taken as primitive: it is an emergent structure produced by the Axiomatic Observer through record-consistent transitions supported by a physical witness network [1]. In Genesis, the “past” is not an ontic location that requires anthropomorphic “witnesses”; “early” and “late” cosmology denote different record sectors Ri ⊂ At inside the Observer’s present axiomatic basis. Accordingly, we treat “witness density” operationally as redundancy and complexity of classical records, not as the presence of observers. Consequently, a reported value of H0 is inherently protocol-defined. The prime purpose of this article is therefore not to propose yet another cosmological “fix,” but to craft an experimentally grounded observational program that can confirm or refute Genesis using existing and near-term datasets. We introduce a minimal phenomenology in which each cosmological probe samples an effective metric stiffness s(ρW ) that depends on a coarsegrained witness density ρW (redundancy of classical records). This recasts the Hubble tension as a structured, falsifiable prediction: protocols that couple to higher witness density should infer systematically larger stiffness, and hence larger effective H0. We then derive a prioritized set of falsification protocols, including witness/complexity-stratified distance-ladder reanalysis in shared host sets, JWST same-host multi-indicator extensions, and global hierarchical fits across CMB/BAO/SNe/time-delays/megamasers/standard sirens, emphasizing low-cost reanalysis opportunities and high-leverage JWST/HST program extensions. Part I summarizes the observational status of the Hubble tension and the relevant measurement pipelines. Part II translates the tension into Genesis language, defining witness density, metric stiffness, and protocol-defined H0. Part III introduces a minimal two-sector (Silent/Manifest) mixture model and a continuous “running” generalization, unifying the treatment with the Genesis fine-structure constant framework. Part IV derives concrete falsification protocols, prioritized by discriminating power per observational dollar.</p> |
| title | The Hubble Tension as Witness-Dependent Metric Stiffness in the Genesis Framework |
| topic | Hubble tension |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17985663 |