Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Recurso digital |
| Lenguaje: | |
| Publicado: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Acceso en línea: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18020773 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866901604841553920 |
|---|---|
| author | Dr.Amirabbas Borhani |
| author_facet | Dr.Amirabbas Borhani |
| contents | <p>We first analyze the empirical failure of the idealized 360-degree magnetic-field symmetry requirement in real SG devices, arguing that these deviations introduce unavoidable systematic biases in observed angular distributions. Second, we demonstrate the inadequacy of the uniform-field assumption when considering the topological nature of spin coupling within the proposed $\eta$-field geometry.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18020773 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Methodological Critique of Two Foundational Assumptions in Spin Experiments and Their Correction within the $\eta$-Field Geometry (CRVD model) Dr.Amirabbas Borhani <p>We first analyze the empirical failure of the idealized 360-degree magnetic-field symmetry requirement in real SG devices, arguing that these deviations introduce unavoidable systematic biases in observed angular distributions. Second, we demonstrate the inadequacy of the uniform-field assumption when considering the topological nature of spin coupling within the proposed $\eta$-field geometry.</p> |
| title | Methodological Critique of Two Foundational Assumptions in Spin Experiments and Their Correction within the $\eta$-Field Geometry (CRVD model) |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18020773 |