A Systematic Review of Transformational and Transactional Leadership Dynamics in Fostering Organizational Commitment and Performance (2018–2025)
Fuente:
Zenodo
Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso digital |
| Pubblicazione: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866901552999956480 |
|---|---|
| author | IJMSRT |
| author_facet | IJMSRT |
| contents | <p>Abstract <br>This study synthesizes recent empirical evidence <br>on the roles of transformational and <br>transactionalleadership in shaping organizational <br>commitmentandperformancewithincontemporar<br>y organizational contexts. Using a systematic <br>literature review guided by the PRISMA 2020 <br>protocol, this research analyzes 45 Scopus<br>indexed articles published between 2018 and <br>2025, retrieved from the Scopus and Web of <br>Science databases. A narrative and thematic <br>synthesis approach was employed to map <br>publicationtrends,methodological characteristics, <br>and dominant theoretical perspectives. The <br>findings reveal a consistent dual<br>pathinfluencemechanism.Transformationalleader<br>ship primarily enhances affective commitment <br>and discretionary performance by fostering <br>intrinsicmotivation,psychological empowerment, <br>organizational citizenship behavior, and <br>knowledge sharing. In contrast, transactional <br>leadership contributes to normative <br>commitment, role clarity, and task performance <br>through contingent rewards, monitoring, and <br>procedural control, particularly in regulated, <br>high-risk, or performance-driven environments. <br>Rather than operating as opposing approaches, <br>both leadership styles demonstrate <br>complementary effects when applied in a hybrid <br>manner. Five dominant themes emerge from the <br>literature: leadership hybridity, affective<br>normative commitment duality, contextual <br>agility, digital readiness, and cross-cultural <br>differentiation. Building on these insights, this <br>study proposes an Integrative Leadership<br>Commitment–Performance (ILCP) framework </p> <p>that unifies intrinsic and extrinsic motivational <br>pathways while accounting for organizational, <br>cultural, and technological contingencies. The <br>review contributes theoretically by extending the <br>Full Range Leadership Model toward a <br>contextual and adaptive perspective, and <br>practically by highlighting the importance of <br>leadership development systems that balance <br>visionary influence with procedural discipline. <br>Overall, the findings suggest a shift in leadership <br>research and practice from rigid typologies <br>toward dynamic, context-embedded leadership <br>systems capable of sustaining commitment and <br>performance in increasingly complex <br>organizational environments..</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18042529 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | A Systematic Review of Transformational and Transactional Leadership Dynamics in Fostering Organizational Commitment and Performance (2018–2025) IJMSRT <p>Abstract <br>This study synthesizes recent empirical evidence <br>on the roles of transformational and <br>transactionalleadership in shaping organizational <br>commitmentandperformancewithincontemporar<br>y organizational contexts. Using a systematic <br>literature review guided by the PRISMA 2020 <br>protocol, this research analyzes 45 Scopus<br>indexed articles published between 2018 and <br>2025, retrieved from the Scopus and Web of <br>Science databases. A narrative and thematic <br>synthesis approach was employed to map <br>publicationtrends,methodological characteristics, <br>and dominant theoretical perspectives. The <br>findings reveal a consistent dual<br>pathinfluencemechanism.Transformationalleader<br>ship primarily enhances affective commitment <br>and discretionary performance by fostering <br>intrinsicmotivation,psychological empowerment, <br>organizational citizenship behavior, and <br>knowledge sharing. In contrast, transactional <br>leadership contributes to normative <br>commitment, role clarity, and task performance <br>through contingent rewards, monitoring, and <br>procedural control, particularly in regulated, <br>high-risk, or performance-driven environments. <br>Rather than operating as opposing approaches, <br>both leadership styles demonstrate <br>complementary effects when applied in a hybrid <br>manner. Five dominant themes emerge from the <br>literature: leadership hybridity, affective<br>normative commitment duality, contextual <br>agility, digital readiness, and cross-cultural <br>differentiation. Building on these insights, this <br>study proposes an Integrative Leadership<br>Commitment–Performance (ILCP) framework </p> <p>that unifies intrinsic and extrinsic motivational <br>pathways while accounting for organizational, <br>cultural, and technological contingencies. The <br>review contributes theoretically by extending the <br>Full Range Leadership Model toward a <br>contextual and adaptive perspective, and <br>practically by highlighting the importance of <br>leadership development systems that balance <br>visionary influence with procedural discipline. <br>Overall, the findings suggest a shift in leadership <br>research and practice from rigid typologies <br>toward dynamic, context-embedded leadership <br>systems capable of sustaining commitment and <br>performance in increasingly complex <br>organizational environments..</p> |
| title | A Systematic Review of Transformational and Transactional Leadership Dynamics in Fostering Organizational Commitment and Performance (2018–2025) |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18042529 |