Tradition, Transformation, and Continuity: Cultural Concepts, Historiography, and Symbolic Change in Indian and Global Contexts Authors and Affiliations Ganesh Shrirang Nale Department of Sociology, Central University of Haryana Dr. Priyanka Sambhaji Jadhavar Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Shivaji University
Fuente:
Zenodo
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso digital |
| Lingua: | inglese |
| Pubblicazione: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866901961318596608 |
|---|---|
| author | SATARKAR, GANESH SHRIRANG Jadhavar, Priyanka Sambhaji |
| author_facet | SATARKAR, GANESH SHRIRANG Jadhavar, Priyanka Sambhaji |
| contents | <h2><strong>Title of the Article</strong></h2> <p><strong>Tradition, Transformation, and Continuity: Cultural Concepts, Historiography, and Symbolic Change in Indian and Global Contexts</strong></p> <h2><strong>Authors and Affiliations</strong></h2> <p><strong>Ganesh Shrirang Nale</strong><br>Department of Sociology, <span><span>Central University of Haryana</span></span></p> <p><strong>Dr. Priyanka Sambhaji Jadhavar</strong><br>Assistant Professor, Department of Law, <span><span>Shivaji University</span></span></p> <h2><strong>Abstract / Detailed Description of the Article</strong></h2> <p>This article presents a comprehensive and interdisciplinary examination of culture as a dynamic and contested concept within the social sciences. Drawing upon sociology, anthropology, history, archaeology, and philosophy, the study critically analyzes traditional and modern understandings of culture while situating Indian cultural experiences within global intellectual debates. Beginning with classical textual traditions such as the Vedas, Upanishads, Dharmashastras, and epics, the paper conceptualizes culture as a moral, symbolic, and prescriptive system deeply embedded in social life. It then traces the evolution of anthropological and sociological theories of culture, engaging with scholars such as Edward B. Tylor, Franz Boas, Clifford Geertz, Émile Durkheim, and Max Weber to illustrate how culture functions as both a system of meaning and a structure of social regulation.</p> <p>The article critically distinguishes between culture and civilization, arguing that material advancement alone cannot define societal progress without ethical and symbolic depth. A significant portion of the study is devoted to historiographical approaches to Indian culture, evaluating imperialist, nationalist, Marxist, and subaltern interpretations while highlighting issues of objectivity, bias, and power in historical knowledge production. Methodologically, the paper assesses ethnographic, historical, and comparative research approaches, emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary frameworks in cultural analysis.</p> <p>The study further explores symbolic transformations in rituals, beliefs, and signs, especially under conditions of globalization, commercialization, and political mobilization. Contemporary cultural processes such as communalism and secularism, commodification of religion, gendered bodies, education systems, moral economy, art, sports, environmental ethics, and new religious movements are critically examined to demonstrate culture’s embeddedness in power relations. By foregrounding India’s civilizational heritage and its global contributions to philosophy, ethics, science, and spirituality, the article argues for a pluralistic, reflexive, and dynamic understanding of culture as a process of both continuity and transformation. The paper contributes meaningfully to cultural sociology and anthropology by integrating classical theory with contemporary social realities.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18055601 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Tradition, Transformation, and Continuity: Cultural Concepts, Historiography, and Symbolic Change in Indian and Global Contexts Authors and Affiliations Ganesh Shrirang Nale Department of Sociology, Central University of Haryana Dr. Priyanka Sambhaji Jadhavar Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Shivaji University SATARKAR, GANESH SHRIRANG Jadhavar, Priyanka Sambhaji Culture, civilization, Indianness, symbolism, ritual, historiography, identity, religion, economy, gender, politics, environment, ethics, education, modernity, tradition, globalization, moral economy, cultural transformation, social power, pluralism. <h2><strong>Title of the Article</strong></h2> <p><strong>Tradition, Transformation, and Continuity: Cultural Concepts, Historiography, and Symbolic Change in Indian and Global Contexts</strong></p> <h2><strong>Authors and Affiliations</strong></h2> <p><strong>Ganesh Shrirang Nale</strong><br>Department of Sociology, <span><span>Central University of Haryana</span></span></p> <p><strong>Dr. Priyanka Sambhaji Jadhavar</strong><br>Assistant Professor, Department of Law, <span><span>Shivaji University</span></span></p> <h2><strong>Abstract / Detailed Description of the Article</strong></h2> <p>This article presents a comprehensive and interdisciplinary examination of culture as a dynamic and contested concept within the social sciences. Drawing upon sociology, anthropology, history, archaeology, and philosophy, the study critically analyzes traditional and modern understandings of culture while situating Indian cultural experiences within global intellectual debates. Beginning with classical textual traditions such as the Vedas, Upanishads, Dharmashastras, and epics, the paper conceptualizes culture as a moral, symbolic, and prescriptive system deeply embedded in social life. It then traces the evolution of anthropological and sociological theories of culture, engaging with scholars such as Edward B. Tylor, Franz Boas, Clifford Geertz, Émile Durkheim, and Max Weber to illustrate how culture functions as both a system of meaning and a structure of social regulation.</p> <p>The article critically distinguishes between culture and civilization, arguing that material advancement alone cannot define societal progress without ethical and symbolic depth. A significant portion of the study is devoted to historiographical approaches to Indian culture, evaluating imperialist, nationalist, Marxist, and subaltern interpretations while highlighting issues of objectivity, bias, and power in historical knowledge production. Methodologically, the paper assesses ethnographic, historical, and comparative research approaches, emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary frameworks in cultural analysis.</p> <p>The study further explores symbolic transformations in rituals, beliefs, and signs, especially under conditions of globalization, commercialization, and political mobilization. Contemporary cultural processes such as communalism and secularism, commodification of religion, gendered bodies, education systems, moral economy, art, sports, environmental ethics, and new religious movements are critically examined to demonstrate culture’s embeddedness in power relations. By foregrounding India’s civilizational heritage and its global contributions to philosophy, ethics, science, and spirituality, the article argues for a pluralistic, reflexive, and dynamic understanding of culture as a process of both continuity and transformation. The paper contributes meaningfully to cultural sociology and anthropology by integrating classical theory with contemporary social realities.</p> |
| title | Tradition, Transformation, and Continuity: Cultural Concepts, Historiography, and Symbolic Change in Indian and Global Contexts Authors and Affiliations Ganesh Shrirang Nale Department of Sociology, Central University of Haryana Dr. Priyanka Sambhaji Jadhavar Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Shivaji University |
| topic | Culture, civilization, Indianness, symbolism, ritual, historiography, identity, religion, economy, gender, politics, environment, ethics, education, modernity, tradition, globalization, moral economy, cultural transformation, social power, pluralism. |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18055601 |