Deterministic Bias Detection for NYC Local Law 144: Why Reproducibility Matters More Than Accuracy

Fuente: Zenodo
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: HAIEC, Lab
Natura: Recurso digital
Lingua:inglese
Pubblicazione: Zenodo 2025
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866901572991057920
author HAIEC, Lab
author_facet HAIEC, Lab
contents <p>This technical report presents a reproducibility-first architecture for detecting linguistic bias in job descriptions under New York City Local Law 144. While most bias detection tools rely on probabilistic machine-learning models, this work argues that regulatory compliance requires deterministic systems capable of producing identical, verifiable results over time.</p> <p>The paper details a deterministic bias detection engine built around rule-based pattern matching, version-controlled lexicons, reproducible scoring, and cryptographic evidence generation. It explains why probabilistic AI models struggle to meet evidentiary and auditability requirements, and how deterministic architectures enable replayable analyses, tamper-evident audit trails, and legally defensible documentation.</p> <p>The report covers system architecture, implementation trade-offs, performance characteristics, known limitations, and deployment patterns, with specific focus on compliance obligations imposed by NYC Local Law 144. It is intended for compliance officers, legal counsel, auditors, HR technology leaders, and engineers building or evaluating AI systems used in employment decision workflows.</p> <p>This work positions deterministic bias detection as a preventive compliance control rather than a substitute for statutory bias audits, and emphasizes transparency, reproducibility, and evidentiary integrity as foundational requirements for responsible AI governance in regulated hiring contexts.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18056133
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2025
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Deterministic Bias Detection for NYC Local Law 144: Why Reproducibility Matters More Than Accuracy
HAIEC, Lab
NYC Local Law 144
AI governance
NYC Local Law 144 bias audit
automated employment decision tools
algorithmic bias
reproducible AI
deterministic AI
AI compliance
employment discrimination
<p>This technical report presents a reproducibility-first architecture for detecting linguistic bias in job descriptions under New York City Local Law 144. While most bias detection tools rely on probabilistic machine-learning models, this work argues that regulatory compliance requires deterministic systems capable of producing identical, verifiable results over time.</p> <p>The paper details a deterministic bias detection engine built around rule-based pattern matching, version-controlled lexicons, reproducible scoring, and cryptographic evidence generation. It explains why probabilistic AI models struggle to meet evidentiary and auditability requirements, and how deterministic architectures enable replayable analyses, tamper-evident audit trails, and legally defensible documentation.</p> <p>The report covers system architecture, implementation trade-offs, performance characteristics, known limitations, and deployment patterns, with specific focus on compliance obligations imposed by NYC Local Law 144. It is intended for compliance officers, legal counsel, auditors, HR technology leaders, and engineers building or evaluating AI systems used in employment decision workflows.</p> <p>This work positions deterministic bias detection as a preventive compliance control rather than a substitute for statutory bias audits, and emphasizes transparency, reproducibility, and evidentiary integrity as foundational requirements for responsible AI governance in regulated hiring contexts.</p>
title Deterministic Bias Detection for NYC Local Law 144: Why Reproducibility Matters More Than Accuracy
topic NYC Local Law 144
AI governance
NYC Local Law 144 bias audit
automated employment decision tools
algorithmic bias
reproducible AI
deterministic AI
AI compliance
employment discrimination
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18056133