On the Non-Necessity of Quantization in Cognitional Mechanics

Fuente: Zenodo
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: T.O.
Format: Recurso digital
Language:English
Published: Zenodo 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866901675835392000
author T.O.
author_facet T.O.
contents <p>This paper establishes that quantization is neither a necessary nor a fundamental operation in Cognitional Mechanics (CM) and its relativistic extension (RCM). Although recent CM-related works employ wave-like representations and operator formalisms, these structures arise from abstract operational constraints rather than from physical quantization in the sense of quantum mechanics. </p> <p>By analyzing the internal coherence and citation closure of the December 2025 IASER, CM, and RCM paper set, this work demonstrates that CM constitutes a self-sufficient abstract theory, independent of physical postulates. Historically, this marks a decisive moment in which mathematical–cognitive structure becomes autonomous from physical theory: not a revolution through paradigm replacement, but a declaration of independence of abstraction itself.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18065325
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2025
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle On the Non-Necessity of Quantization in Cognitional Mechanics
T.O.
Theoretical physics
Mathematical physics
Quantum physics
Quantum Theory
Quantum Theory/history
History
Science
Science
Computational science
Science/history
Physical science
Cognitional Mechanics
IASER
Artificial intelligence
<p>This paper establishes that quantization is neither a necessary nor a fundamental operation in Cognitional Mechanics (CM) and its relativistic extension (RCM). Although recent CM-related works employ wave-like representations and operator formalisms, these structures arise from abstract operational constraints rather than from physical quantization in the sense of quantum mechanics. </p> <p>By analyzing the internal coherence and citation closure of the December 2025 IASER, CM, and RCM paper set, this work demonstrates that CM constitutes a self-sufficient abstract theory, independent of physical postulates. Historically, this marks a decisive moment in which mathematical–cognitive structure becomes autonomous from physical theory: not a revolution through paradigm replacement, but a declaration of independence of abstraction itself.</p>
title On the Non-Necessity of Quantization in Cognitional Mechanics
topic Theoretical physics
Mathematical physics
Quantum physics
Quantum Theory
Quantum Theory/history
History
Science
Science
Computational science
Science/history
Physical science
Cognitional Mechanics
IASER
Artificial intelligence
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18065325