Discontinuity as Insurance: Why Life Persists Beyond Gradualism, life beyond Darwin

Fuente: Zenodo
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bresciano, Claudio
Formato: Recurso digital
Lenguaje:inglés
Publicado: Zenodo 2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866901119802802176
author Bresciano, Claudio
author_facet Bresciano, Claudio
contents <p>Traditional evolutionary theory, rooted in gradualism, posits that biological persistence is maintained through continuous stochastic search and incremental adaptation. This paper argues that such a mechanism is structurally insufficient to ensure survival during abrupt, non-linear shifts in environmental boundary conditions. Drawing from the <strong>Theorem of Axiomatic Necessity (TNA)</strong>, we propose that <strong>discontinuity</strong> is not a failure of biological systems, but rather their primary <strong>insurance mechanism</strong>.</p> <p>When a system's information-processing throughput (Psi) is overwhelmed by rapid boundary shifts, the probability of finding a viable state via random mutation collapses to zero (P \approx 0). In these critical regimes, life persists by bypassing probabilistic search and "collapsing" directly into structurally mandated configurations. We define this as <strong>Regime Reorganization</strong>: a discrete phase transition where biological form is dictated by new physical and energetic constraints rather than cumulative selection. By reframing discontinuity as a structural necessity, we resolve the paradox of biological resilience in volatile geological records and establish that life’s continuity is guaranteed by the very discrete jumps that gradualism fails to explain.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18072915
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2025
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Discontinuity as Insurance: Why Life Persists Beyond Gradualism, life beyond Darwin
Bresciano, Claudio
Biological Discontinuity, Theorem of Axiomatic Necessity (TNA), Structural Insurance, Regime Collapse, Phase Transition, Probability Collapse, Boundary Conditions, Minimal Coherence (F_min), Non-Darwinian Persistence, Evolutionary Throughput.
<p>Traditional evolutionary theory, rooted in gradualism, posits that biological persistence is maintained through continuous stochastic search and incremental adaptation. This paper argues that such a mechanism is structurally insufficient to ensure survival during abrupt, non-linear shifts in environmental boundary conditions. Drawing from the <strong>Theorem of Axiomatic Necessity (TNA)</strong>, we propose that <strong>discontinuity</strong> is not a failure of biological systems, but rather their primary <strong>insurance mechanism</strong>.</p> <p>When a system's information-processing throughput (Psi) is overwhelmed by rapid boundary shifts, the probability of finding a viable state via random mutation collapses to zero (P \approx 0). In these critical regimes, life persists by bypassing probabilistic search and "collapsing" directly into structurally mandated configurations. We define this as <strong>Regime Reorganization</strong>: a discrete phase transition where biological form is dictated by new physical and energetic constraints rather than cumulative selection. By reframing discontinuity as a structural necessity, we resolve the paradox of biological resilience in volatile geological records and establish that life’s continuity is guaranteed by the very discrete jumps that gradualism fails to explain.</p>
title Discontinuity as Insurance: Why Life Persists Beyond Gradualism, life beyond Darwin
topic Biological Discontinuity, Theorem of Axiomatic Necessity (TNA), Structural Insurance, Regime Collapse, Phase Transition, Probability Collapse, Boundary Conditions, Minimal Coherence (F_min), Non-Darwinian Persistence, Evolutionary Throughput.
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18072915