Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso digital |
| Lingua: | inglese |
| Pubblicazione: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18091831 |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866901500128657408 |
|---|---|
| author | Moghadasnian, Seyyedabdolhojjat Jafartayari Dehaghani, Mostafa Hoseini Taheri, Javad Mohammad Haghighi, Nafiseh Karami Esfeh, ShamsolHoda Karami, Fatemeh MoghadasNian, AqilaSadat |
| author_facet | Moghadasnian, Seyyedabdolhojjat Jafartayari Dehaghani, Mostafa Hoseini Taheri, Javad Mohammad Haghighi, Nafiseh Karami Esfeh, ShamsolHoda Karami, Fatemeh MoghadasNian, AqilaSadat |
| contents | <p><span>This article operationalizes Islamic rapprochement as a governed, measurable program. It fuses Causal Layered Analysis litany, systems, discourse, myth with a KPI-driven performance architecture (UCTA-PA) comprising 280 indicators: 140 Crisis Warning Indicators (CWIs) and 140 Strategic Progress Indicators (SPIs). A mixed-methods design integrates AI-assisted corpus and network analytics, purposive–stratified expert input, institutional document analysis, and pre-registered quasi-experimental estimators (staggered difference-in-differences, synthetic control, interrupted time-series). Programmatic validation shows target-concordant movements: reductions in Hate-Speech Rate and Polarization Velocity; increases in the Theological Respect Index and Joint-Institution Density; improvements in legal Interoperability Score; and severity-weighted declines in Inter-sect Incident Rate. Mechanism checks indicate discourse improvements precede incident reductions under high implementation fidelity. Theoretically, the study extends CLA by specifying a governance-grade indicator grammar that projects deep discursive and mythic drivers onto observable signals. Practically, it delivers a thermostat for decision-makers traffic-light thresholds tied to corrective playbooks, explicit ownership, and cadences enabling auditable progress toward rapprochement within a 12–24-month horizon. Actionable recommendations include publishing an indicator dictionary with non-compensatory floors for CWIs, aligning financing and recognition to verified SPI gains, and embedding narrative telemetry in data-governance pipelines with bias auditing and privacy-by-design.</span></p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18091831 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Pathology of Divergence & Engineering Unity: A CLA-to-KPI Governance Architecture (UCTA-PA, 140 CWIs + 140 SPIs) Moghadasnian, Seyyedabdolhojjat Jafartayari Dehaghani, Mostafa Hoseini Taheri, Javad Mohammad Haghighi, Nafiseh Karami Esfeh, ShamsolHoda Karami, Fatemeh MoghadasNian, AqilaSadat Islamic Rapprochement Taqrib Causal Layered Analysis (CLA) UCTA-PA Crisis Warning Indicators (CWIs) Strategic Progress Indicators (SPIs) Indicator Governance Quasi-Experimental Evaluation <p><span>This article operationalizes Islamic rapprochement as a governed, measurable program. It fuses Causal Layered Analysis litany, systems, discourse, myth with a KPI-driven performance architecture (UCTA-PA) comprising 280 indicators: 140 Crisis Warning Indicators (CWIs) and 140 Strategic Progress Indicators (SPIs). A mixed-methods design integrates AI-assisted corpus and network analytics, purposive–stratified expert input, institutional document analysis, and pre-registered quasi-experimental estimators (staggered difference-in-differences, synthetic control, interrupted time-series). Programmatic validation shows target-concordant movements: reductions in Hate-Speech Rate and Polarization Velocity; increases in the Theological Respect Index and Joint-Institution Density; improvements in legal Interoperability Score; and severity-weighted declines in Inter-sect Incident Rate. Mechanism checks indicate discourse improvements precede incident reductions under high implementation fidelity. Theoretically, the study extends CLA by specifying a governance-grade indicator grammar that projects deep discursive and mythic drivers onto observable signals. Practically, it delivers a thermostat for decision-makers traffic-light thresholds tied to corrective playbooks, explicit ownership, and cadences enabling auditable progress toward rapprochement within a 12–24-month horizon. Actionable recommendations include publishing an indicator dictionary with non-compensatory floors for CWIs, aligning financing and recognition to verified SPI gains, and embedding narrative telemetry in data-governance pipelines with bias auditing and privacy-by-design.</span></p> |
| title | Pathology of Divergence & Engineering Unity: A CLA-to-KPI Governance Architecture (UCTA-PA, 140 CWIs + 140 SPIs) |
| topic | Islamic Rapprochement Taqrib Causal Layered Analysis (CLA) UCTA-PA Crisis Warning Indicators (CWIs) Strategic Progress Indicators (SPIs) Indicator Governance Quasi-Experimental Evaluation |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18091831 |