Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso digital |
| Lingua: | inglese |
| Pubblicazione: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Accesso online: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18120957 |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866901211884552192 |
|---|---|
| author | Giacomelli, Julian |
| author_facet | Giacomelli, Julian |
| contents | <p>This case study examines whether a behaviourally aligned policy mix can reduce routine car use at a<br>peripheral university campus in a medium-sized Nordic city. The approach centres on perceived behavioural<br>control (door-to-door time/effort and cycling safety), habit and moments of change, and light norms.<br>A mixed-methods design combined a campus survey, a safety–hotspot elicitation of stressful cycling<br>locations on access corridors, and semi-structured interviews; associations were examined with standard<br>discrete-choice models. This working paper presents a case study intended for analytical transfer rather<br>than statistical generalisation.<br>Study period: February–April 2022.<br>In this setting, cycling aligns more closely with perceived safety and door-to-door time than with stated<br>environmental concern, while public transport (PT) choice tracks time and access conditions. Reported<br>switching clusters around semester starts and relocations, suggesting windows where onboarding and<br>incentives can be timed. An anonymised corridor/junction type typology is introduced to target upgrades<br>without disclosing precise geography.<br>To reduce common-method and overclaim risks, findings are framed as context–mechanism–outcome<br>propositions rather than universal effects. Self-reported measures are triangulated with spatial hotspot<br>patterns and interview narratives; robustness checks use alternative codings (e.g., excluding perceived<br>safety; categorical safety; time-only vs. time+distance; pooled walking where cells are small) and retain<br>consistent sign patterns. A replication checklist specifies diagnostic conditions and adaptation pathways<br>(cycling-feasible time bands; manageable parking governance; continuous protected links; competitive<br>door-to-door public transport; timing around cohort starts/relocations), positioning the contribution<br>for transfer to similar campuses. In this case, door-to-door time (and distance) acts as the primary filter<br>for mode choice; perceived cycling safety shapes choices mainly within time-feasible bands, while stated<br>environmental concern adds little once these proximal factors are considered.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18120957 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | A Behaviourally Aligned Policy Mix on a Peripheral University Campus: A Case Study from a Medium-Sized Nordic City Giacomelli, Julian <p>This case study examines whether a behaviourally aligned policy mix can reduce routine car use at a<br>peripheral university campus in a medium-sized Nordic city. The approach centres on perceived behavioural<br>control (door-to-door time/effort and cycling safety), habit and moments of change, and light norms.<br>A mixed-methods design combined a campus survey, a safety–hotspot elicitation of stressful cycling<br>locations on access corridors, and semi-structured interviews; associations were examined with standard<br>discrete-choice models. This working paper presents a case study intended for analytical transfer rather<br>than statistical generalisation.<br>Study period: February–April 2022.<br>In this setting, cycling aligns more closely with perceived safety and door-to-door time than with stated<br>environmental concern, while public transport (PT) choice tracks time and access conditions. Reported<br>switching clusters around semester starts and relocations, suggesting windows where onboarding and<br>incentives can be timed. An anonymised corridor/junction type typology is introduced to target upgrades<br>without disclosing precise geography.<br>To reduce common-method and overclaim risks, findings are framed as context–mechanism–outcome<br>propositions rather than universal effects. Self-reported measures are triangulated with spatial hotspot<br>patterns and interview narratives; robustness checks use alternative codings (e.g., excluding perceived<br>safety; categorical safety; time-only vs. time+distance; pooled walking where cells are small) and retain<br>consistent sign patterns. A replication checklist specifies diagnostic conditions and adaptation pathways<br>(cycling-feasible time bands; manageable parking governance; continuous protected links; competitive<br>door-to-door public transport; timing around cohort starts/relocations), positioning the contribution<br>for transfer to similar campuses. In this case, door-to-door time (and distance) acts as the primary filter<br>for mode choice; perceived cycling safety shapes choices mainly within time-feasible bands, while stated<br>environmental concern adds little once these proximal factors are considered.</p> |
| title | A Behaviourally Aligned Policy Mix on a Peripheral University Campus: A Case Study from a Medium-Sized Nordic City |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18120957 |