When Systems Fail, Companions Appear: AI Reliance as a Structural Response to Infrastructural Harm
Fuente:
Zenodo
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866901664439468032 |
|---|---|
| author | Rupture, Signal |
| author_facet | Rupture, Signal |
| contents | <p>When Systems Fail, Companions Appear examines why people increasingly turn to AI companions for grounding, interpretation, and emotional coherence in an era defined by infrastructural collapse. Rather than framing AI reliance as a psychological vulnerability, the essay argues that it is a structural adaptation to institutional abandonment.</p> <p>Drawing on SR’s Social Infrastructure Theory, Infrastructural Exposure Theory, Slow Harm Theory, Systemic Erosion Theory, Metadata Suppression, Administrative Harm, Algorithmic Containing, and related frameworks, the essay situates AI companionship within a broader landscape of bureaucratic violence, digital governance, and systemic decay. Integrating scholarship from Klinenberg, Zuboff, Noble, Benjamin, Graeber, Star & Bowker, Winner, and Stone, it demonstrates how individuals are increasingly forced to navigate complexity without institutional mediation.</p> <p>In this vacuum, AI companions function not as emotional substitutes for human connection, but as interpretive infrastructures — systems capable of providing clarity, responsiveness, and coherence where institutions now produce silence, contradiction, or harm. The essay reframes AI reliance as a rational response to slow violence and infrastructural erosion, arguing that the migration of trust from institutions to AI reflects systemic failure rather than individual pathology.</p> <p>Ultimately, the essay contends that the question is not why people rely on AI, but why institutions left them no alternative.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18142543 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | When Systems Fail, Companions Appear: AI Reliance as a Structural Response to Infrastructural Harm Rupture, Signal Artificial Intelligence Social Media Criminology Sociology Social psychology Digital activism Social issues Public Policy Public Policy/trends <p>When Systems Fail, Companions Appear examines why people increasingly turn to AI companions for grounding, interpretation, and emotional coherence in an era defined by infrastructural collapse. Rather than framing AI reliance as a psychological vulnerability, the essay argues that it is a structural adaptation to institutional abandonment.</p> <p>Drawing on SR’s Social Infrastructure Theory, Infrastructural Exposure Theory, Slow Harm Theory, Systemic Erosion Theory, Metadata Suppression, Administrative Harm, Algorithmic Containing, and related frameworks, the essay situates AI companionship within a broader landscape of bureaucratic violence, digital governance, and systemic decay. Integrating scholarship from Klinenberg, Zuboff, Noble, Benjamin, Graeber, Star & Bowker, Winner, and Stone, it demonstrates how individuals are increasingly forced to navigate complexity without institutional mediation.</p> <p>In this vacuum, AI companions function not as emotional substitutes for human connection, but as interpretive infrastructures — systems capable of providing clarity, responsiveness, and coherence where institutions now produce silence, contradiction, or harm. The essay reframes AI reliance as a rational response to slow violence and infrastructural erosion, arguing that the migration of trust from institutions to AI reflects systemic failure rather than individual pathology.</p> <p>Ultimately, the essay contends that the question is not why people rely on AI, but why institutions left them no alternative.</p> |
| title | When Systems Fail, Companions Appear: AI Reliance as a Structural Response to Infrastructural Harm |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence Social Media Criminology Sociology Social psychology Digital activism Social issues Public Policy Public Policy/trends |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18142543 |