Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Fröderberg, J. E.
Format: Recurso digital
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Zenodo 2026
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18171061
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866901177696780288
author Fröderberg, J. E.
author_facet Fröderberg, J. E.
contents <p><strong>Post-Consent Governance Drift (PCGD)</strong> presents a regime-independent axiomatic and synthetic derivation of governance drift in durable cooperative systems.</p> <p>Within explicitly stated scope conditions, the paper derives a necessary drift chain showing how weakening role distinctness and accountability attribution undermines directed correction, leading systems to substitute procedural stability and acceptance indicators for operational consent.</p> <p>The theory is non-empirical and non-normative. It advances formal constraints on governance viability rather than causal explanations or policy prescriptions.</p> <p>Two municipal-level instantiation blueprints are provided to demonstrate operational applicability without reliance on actor psychology, opinion data, or ideological assumptions.</p> <p>This record constitutes the formal PCGD derivation within the AST corpus.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18171061
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2026
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Post-Consent Governance Drift
Fröderberg, J. E.
AST
governance drift
accountability
attribution
legitimacy
consent
procedural substitution
New Public Governance
municipal administration
organizational diagnostics
<p><strong>Post-Consent Governance Drift (PCGD)</strong> presents a regime-independent axiomatic and synthetic derivation of governance drift in durable cooperative systems.</p> <p>Within explicitly stated scope conditions, the paper derives a necessary drift chain showing how weakening role distinctness and accountability attribution undermines directed correction, leading systems to substitute procedural stability and acceptance indicators for operational consent.</p> <p>The theory is non-empirical and non-normative. It advances formal constraints on governance viability rather than causal explanations or policy prescriptions.</p> <p>Two municipal-level instantiation blueprints are provided to demonstrate operational applicability without reliance on actor psychology, opinion data, or ideological assumptions.</p> <p>This record constitutes the formal PCGD derivation within the AST corpus.</p>
title Post-Consent Governance Drift
topic AST
governance drift
accountability
attribution
legitimacy
consent
procedural substitution
New Public Governance
municipal administration
organizational diagnostics
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18171061