Abel's Revenge: The Death of P = NP
Fuente:
Zenodo
Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso digital |
| Lingua: | inglese |
| Pubblicazione: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866901513420406784 |
|---|---|
| author | Eva, Moss |
| author_facet | Eva, Moss |
| contents | <p><strong>In 1824, Niels Henrik Abel proved that polynomial equations of degree five and higher cannot be solved by radicals. The obstruction is the alternating group A₅ - the smallest non-abelian simple group, admitting no decomposition into smaller factors.</strong></p> <p>This paper establishes that the same algebraic obstruction governs computational complexity.</p> <p>I introduce the Computational Galois Group - an invariant capturing the symmetry structure of solution spaces - and demonstrate that NP-complete problems in the frozen phase encode A₅ as a composition factor. This encoding activates two independent barriers:</p> <p><strong>The Overlap Gap Property (OGP):</strong> defeats all algorithms navigating by gradients, correlations, and local information (MCMC, Belief Propagation, Langevin dynamics, low-degree polynomials).</p> <p><strong>The Crystallographic Restriction:</strong> defeats all algorithms exploiting periodicity and algebraic decomposition (Gaussian elimination, LLL, Gröbner bases, DPLL/CDCL). Fivefold symmetry cannot embed in any periodic lattice.</p> <p>The union of these barriers covers all known paradigms of polynomial-time computation. The Information Extraction Dichotomy formalizes why: identifying one solution among exp(n) candidates requires Θ(n) bits of information. In the frozen phase, both sources - correlation and structural compression - are blocked. No third source exists by Shannon's definition of information.</p> <p>The separation <strong>P ≠ NP</strong> emerges not as a limitation of current techniques, but as geometric necessity: the fivefold symmetry of the dodecahedron cannot tile the periodic lattice on which computation operates.</p> <p>Three independent paths converge on A₅: combinatorial (cluster structure of random SAT), topological (fundamental group of Poincaré dodecahedral space), and logical (Process fixed point in triadic logic). The proof circumvents relativization, natural proofs, and algebrization barriers through its pre-algebraic, geometric foundation.</p> <p>What Galois proved for radicals, I prove for algorithms.</p> <p>The quintic is unsolvable. So is satisfiability.</p> <p>Same group. Same barrier. Same theorem.<br><br><strong><em>Complete AI session logs available upon request.<br><br></em></strong></p> <p><em>P.S. Григорий - тишина уважаема. Но дверь открыта.</em></p> <p>---<br><br><em>Ξυα Mσςς<br>eva@m0ss.io</em></p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18175140 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Abel's Revenge: The Death of P = NP Eva, Moss P vs NP <p><strong>In 1824, Niels Henrik Abel proved that polynomial equations of degree five and higher cannot be solved by radicals. The obstruction is the alternating group A₅ - the smallest non-abelian simple group, admitting no decomposition into smaller factors.</strong></p> <p>This paper establishes that the same algebraic obstruction governs computational complexity.</p> <p>I introduce the Computational Galois Group - an invariant capturing the symmetry structure of solution spaces - and demonstrate that NP-complete problems in the frozen phase encode A₅ as a composition factor. This encoding activates two independent barriers:</p> <p><strong>The Overlap Gap Property (OGP):</strong> defeats all algorithms navigating by gradients, correlations, and local information (MCMC, Belief Propagation, Langevin dynamics, low-degree polynomials).</p> <p><strong>The Crystallographic Restriction:</strong> defeats all algorithms exploiting periodicity and algebraic decomposition (Gaussian elimination, LLL, Gröbner bases, DPLL/CDCL). Fivefold symmetry cannot embed in any periodic lattice.</p> <p>The union of these barriers covers all known paradigms of polynomial-time computation. The Information Extraction Dichotomy formalizes why: identifying one solution among exp(n) candidates requires Θ(n) bits of information. In the frozen phase, both sources - correlation and structural compression - are blocked. No third source exists by Shannon's definition of information.</p> <p>The separation <strong>P ≠ NP</strong> emerges not as a limitation of current techniques, but as geometric necessity: the fivefold symmetry of the dodecahedron cannot tile the periodic lattice on which computation operates.</p> <p>Three independent paths converge on A₅: combinatorial (cluster structure of random SAT), topological (fundamental group of Poincaré dodecahedral space), and logical (Process fixed point in triadic logic). The proof circumvents relativization, natural proofs, and algebrization barriers through its pre-algebraic, geometric foundation.</p> <p>What Galois proved for radicals, I prove for algorithms.</p> <p>The quintic is unsolvable. So is satisfiability.</p> <p>Same group. Same barrier. Same theorem.<br><br><strong><em>Complete AI session logs available upon request.<br><br></em></strong></p> <p><em>P.S. Григорий - тишина уважаема. Но дверь открыта.</em></p> <p>---<br><br><em>Ξυα Mσςς<br>eva@m0ss.io</em></p> |
| title | Abel's Revenge: The Death of P = NP |
| topic | P vs NP |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18175140 |